How to define local wealth and per capita? What's the difference between them?

Look at the structure of urban household assets first.

You will find that in urban household assets, households account for 59%, which is an average. If you have considered some properties, such as shops, apartments, etc. About houses, these assets account for 68% of the total assets of urban residents, which is equivalent to most of the assets of urban residents. In fact, they are real estate. There are also some financial assets, with an average of about 5 million per person. In fact, apart from real estate, the financial assets of urban residents are not that large. On the contrary, what are the assets of rural families?

Everyone thinks that the homestead thinking corresponds to the residential buildings in this city. In addition, farmers have land, that is, collective land in the village, not only cultivated land, but also some collective commercial construction land. Generally speaking, the weight of this land belongs to the village collective. In villagers' groups, farmers have the right to obtain qualifications in homestays and may have the right to contract cultivated land. But farmers obviously cannot build houses or factories on the collective land in the village. We understand the nature of these assets, so we can understand why they should also be developed into agriculture, but the roof of urban residents' family assets.

Secondly, there is a labor shortage. Most rural people live in their youth. They can create wealth in their hometown, and then who wants to leave the country! Ordinary rural areas are often very different. The main laborers in the village have gone to work in the city, but the time in the countryside has been empty for a long time. It is precisely because of the backbone of rural people that they have innovative thinking, both in economy and overall planning, showing their times. Poverty is relative, not supporting rural areas and cities, but also supporting people living in these places. Many people are working hard in this city.

They are not as good as the rural people in the city because they are in the city or the rural areas of the city. They are the direct beneficiaries of urban development. Their land is very valuable because of the madness of the city. You can envy many people and you can see them. They don't work or farm, and their monthly income is very high. They are real portraits of real city residents. They either rely on land compensation or give their houses to others, and their monthly income is higher than that of white-collar workers. Multiplier. With the development of the city, a large number of workers flood into the city, but the house price, house price and house rent are all high. Many people choose to live in the "countryside", especially in the countryside on the edge of these cities, which becomes very crowded. Every family has a building with several floors, and all rents are higher than those in cities, so many people are willing to pay. Most of these villages in the city have become the summary fields for migrant workers.