Should the same budget buy second-hand houses in urban areas or new houses in suburbs?

Under the same budget, should we buy an old public house in the urban area or a new house in the suburbs? This is probably a "multiple choice question" that many people have done. Generally speaking, the second-hand houses in urban areas have the advantages of superior location, convenient transportation and complete facilities, but under the same total price, the houses are generally old and small in area. Although the new house in the suburbs is a little remote, it is better than the new apartment, with good residential environment and good regional planning. Cost-effective PK supports old houses in urban areas. Reason: 1, an existing house, with the highest cost performance. 2. The quality of old houses is also excellent. The landscape of the community is just a gimmick. 3. It is convenient for downtown to go to work and buy things. Reason: 1, large house area is the biggest advantage. 2. Relatively speaking, it is more secure to choose the projects of big developers. The design of the new site is more in line with modern people's life concept. The subway has enough traffic and will be mature in two or three years. In terms of transportation, travel, and living facilities, I really can't find anything worthy of criticism in my husband's family in the city at the moment. It's ready-made anyway. Good or not, I don't like it at first sight. No one can know what I saw is true. It is convenient to go to work and shop. If you live in the suburbs, even if you drive to work, the traffic jam will be very serious. It's no exaggeration to go to work for two or three hours. It's very troublesome to go shopping and drive. If you live in a city, you can really save a few hours of commuting time, and shopping is very convenient. Being close to home at work is always king! At this point, it should be said that it is the place where the old houses in the city win! Although some suburban new sites are also flaunting the subway planning and commercial supporting planning where their real estate is located, these things are not for developers to decide. Before the policy plan is finalized, it is often just the opinion draft of some people who have not been demonstrated. Of course, the disadvantages of the husband's house are also obvious: the improved demand for buying a husband's house in the urban area may come faster. Under the same budget, the total area of buying a house in the urban area is definitely small, and there is no big house to live in. Even if we can meet the needs of the two-person world now, it will be very troublesome to add a baby to the house in the future. In addition, buying a husband's house also needs to pay attention to the length of property rights. Because the construction of husband's houses in urban areas is generally long, some property rights may only be thirty or forty years. The layout of old houses is not reasonable enough, and there is no mature property service. In 1980s and 1990s, the traditional external structure of second-hand houses was single, and the internal layout was not satisfactory. The room is not bright enough, the hall area is too narrow, and some old houses don't even have a living room. Because it was built earlier, there is no perfect and mature property service. In addition, some old houses may not have formed independent communities or even a decent door.