Real estate hot search

Now the voice of canceling the property is very high, and almost 80% of the owners are very dissatisfied with the property. The job of the property should be to serve the owner, but now the property has obviously become the owner's? Leadership? It is not a case to threaten the owner with water and electricity cuts accidentally. From a national perspective, what the property did caused public outrage. Collecting money from the owners, but not doing business, the management of the community is in a mess, but it is always plausible, which has become a remarkable feature of the property agency. The property is not doing business properly. As the owner, it will naturally take action if you submit to humiliation. Now most communities have owners' committees. If the owners' committee is established according to law, and the residential property management is improper, the owners' committee has the right to recall the property in accordance with laws and regulations and exercise legal rights.

But on the surface, the owners' committee has the right to speak for the owners, but it is not easy to implement it. Recently, a news that the owners and property personnel of a residential area staged an all-out martial arts show was searched. The reason is that the owners' committee moved the original property that was not done, and the contract of the original property has expired. The owners' committee organized bidding according to the rules, and selected a new property to move into the residential area. This move was regarded as a thorn in the side of the old property company, so a big war began.

Whether the property service qualification will be revoked has little to do with whether there is a contradiction between the community owners and property personnel. Whether the owners beat the property or the property personnel beat the owners, the responsibilities of both parties should be judged according to law. And whether the property service qualification has been revoked, whether the property management is legal and compliant, and whether the owners are satisfied.

Judging from the news cases, it is obvious that the owner was dissatisfied with the original property before re-hiring a new property company, and the original property service qualification was revoked, mainly because the contract expired, and then the owner was dissatisfied with the management of the property before revoking the service qualification of the original property. Property should serve the owners wholeheartedly, above the owners, and it is reasonable to be disqualified from service.