The building area is less than 2 square meters, and the owner angrily smashed the neighbor wall. Why did he ruin his neighbor without looking for a developer?

This is about Ms. Zhou of Wuhan who bought a house in Longyang Times Square, Hanyang District, but the area was 2 square meters less. It is reported that Ms. Zhou bought Room 906 of Block A, and she smashed the house of Mr. Liu, the neighbor of Room 905. Mr. Liu bought this house on 20 17. Because Mr. Liu wants to rent this house, no one lives in it recently, but on August 4 this year, he received a phone call from the property. The property phone said that her neighbor, Ms. Zhou, was taking people to smash the wall of his house. Unfortunately, when the property management personnel arrived, there was already a hole in Ms. Zhou's wall.

In fact, Ms. Zhou went to Mr. Liu before and told him: the second floor of my house is less than two square meters, but that part has been distributed to you. I hope you can give me this place back? Mr. Liu thinks that everything he repossesses the house is in accordance with the procedure. As for the extra area, he has paid the corresponding purchase price to the developer. Therefore, Mr. Liu did not agree with Ms. Zhou's request. Mr. Liu said that he was also a victim and hoped that Ms. Zhou could solve it peacefully.

Ms. Zhou sued the developer in April this year after failing to negotiate with Mr. Liu. In June this year, the court held a trial on this matter, and Mr. Liu also participated in the trial. After all, this still has a lot to do with Mr. Liu. However, because many of Ms. Zhou's demands involve many interests, such as restoring the housing structure, returning the housing area, and compensating other losses, the court held that Ms. Zhou and Mr. Liu had differences on the area difference in the contract, and both parties renovated the house. If the area is restored, the economic losses of both sides are quite large. Therefore, the court disagreed with Ms. Zhou's claim and ruled that the developer should pay Ms. Zhou 1492 1.92 yuan. Other claims were rejected.

However, Ms. Zhou was not satisfied with this judgment and appealed again. After the first judgment came out 10 days, Ms. Zhou took people to smash the wall of Mr. Liu's house. In fact, this wall smashing has experienced two climaxes. After the property informed Mr. Liu, Mr. Liu quickly arrived at the scene and chose to call the police. At the suggestion of the police, Ms. Zhou promised not to smash the wall again, but shortly after the police left, Ms. Zhou found someone to smash the wall again, and Mr. Liu called the police again. After this wall smashing, the wall has been smashed with a hole of about 0.5 meters, and many decoration places on Mr. Liu's side have also been smashed, such as the bathroom mirror, washbasin damage and wall cracking.

In addition, Mr. Liu also advocates that the other party's unauthorized smashing of the wall has affected his own house rental and he is a victim; But Ms. Zhou also has her own reasons: I have been giving him extra diplomatic property fees and mortgages in recent years, and I am the victim. ? In my opinion, it is really wrong for Ms. Zhou to smash the wall without authorization, but when Mr. Liu closed the house, he knew that he occupied more of the other party's area, but he did not discuss it. It is obviously inappropriate to pay the house purchase directly, but it is obviously the developer who should be most responsible.