What are the difficulties and problems in community regional party building?

Subjective understanding is not in place.

First, some community cadres have insufficient understanding of the importance and necessity of regionalization of community party building work in the new period and new situation. Many community cadres still follow the top-down unit management model in the past, which has caused a lot of management gaps for a large number of residents, especially those who have changed from "unit people" to "social people". Some community cadres' understanding of the rich connotation of regional community party building is too simple. In their view, the regionalized Party building simply organizes several activities, holds several meetings and watches several audio-visual films every year in party member within its jurisdiction, even if the task is completed, it has not improved the regionalized pattern of Party building to better serve the community and enhance the level of urbanization. Second, some resident units are not enthusiastic about the regionalization of party building work. Concentrated on the subjective views of some unit leaders, party member has reached the standard of qualified party member by playing a role in the unit, and it is unnecessary to carry out party member activities in the unit and the community at the same time. Third, the leadership role of many units has not been completely changed. In the community activities in party member, some unit leaders put on airs, signed up for the community and asked the secretary to do it for them, instead of going to the community for investigation all the year round. Suggestions and guidance for community party building work are often on paper and become a mere formality. Fourthly, some retired cadres, those who have left party member, "two new" organizations and mobile party member have a cold attitude towards community party building, and lack the enthusiasm and initiative to participate in community activities.

The idea of regionalization construction is not open.

With the acceleration of economic and social development and the improvement of urbanization level, the number of community party member is increasing, and the team structure of party member is becoming more and more complex, which makes the community party building work encounter many new situations and problems. At the same time, the party building work in many communities still stays within the scope of daily work such as the transfer of organizational relations in party member and the convening of general party membership meeting. There seems to be insufficient resource integration in expanding the coverage of the Party's grass-roots work and enhancing the influence and penetration of Party organizations in community work.

The degree of democratic autonomy in the community is not high.

At present, there are some problems in community party building, such as single platform and weak pertinence. At present, the nature and function of the community are quite different from its own democratic autonomy, and the phenomenon of "administration" is very serious. To a great extent, the community has become the antenna of many grass-roots departments and units, and community workers are tired of helping these functional units to provide services and implement services.

Regional construction lacks a long-term mechanism.

At present, the joint meeting of community participation and party building work in party member and the activity of "* * * building * * building" in the jurisdiction have played a certain role in the regionalization of party building, but at present, most of these operation forms are still in the state of "friendship", "human feelings" and "assistance", and the leaders of a certain unit are familiar with or have friendship with community cadres, so they have greater support for the community; When a community carries out activities, it is often in the name of friendship activities, and units within its jurisdiction can be ordered to participate in community activities. This development model of party building work is seriously unstable and has many uncertain factors, which is obviously not conducive to the long-term healthy development of the work.

Community party building work is weak.

First, the overlapping of functions and the phenomenon of multiple jobs in one post are very common. Because the existing community staff is generally 5- 10, the corresponding departments should be directly under dozens of functional departments in counties (cities), community full-time staff often wear several hats, while party building staff often wear several hats. Second, there are fewer people and more things, and they are tired of coping. Many functional departments have given a lot of their own business work to the community, which makes the community staff busy with the tasks explained to the functional departments, but unable to build the community. Third, the funding guarantee is weak. Although the county (city) finance budgets a certain amount of work funds for the community every year, it is extremely asymmetrical with the tedious work tasks of the community throughout the year. In the limited working funds, it is even less used for party building work. At the same time, due to the insufficient efforts of some units to implement policies, a lot of work funds for "fees follow events" have not been turned over to the community as required.

The phenomenon of different pay for equal work is more prominent.

There are not many community workers, but the composition is complex, including civil servants, collective cadres and recruiters. Their work in the community is very heavy and stressful, but there is a big gap in treatment. The salaries of civil servants are high and stable, while those of collective cadres and recruiters are relatively low. Some recruiters earn thousands of dollars a year, but they are engaged in urgent, difficult, risky and heavy work. Different pay for equal work makes many cadres feel unbalanced.

The above discussion is for reference only and I hope it will help you.