How to state the understanding of property management

It should be said that the original intention of developers to extend and effectively spread their own brands through property is good. However, for a long time, the problems left over from early development have become the core crux of the contradiction in property management. Whether it is commissioned or established, the developer's emphasis on his own brand has gradually evolved into a silent after-sales service model of "father and son fighting, tiger fighting and brothers fighting". With the help of interest-driven, developers always cheat the owners and evade their responsibilities through the property, and property companies often adopt the attitude of buck passing to hone the owners. Finally, all the "rhetoric" before the developer sells the house has become a fart!

Although property management has developed for more than 20 years, it has also brought up many talents in the industry. But to sum up, there are two disadvantages at present: first, the dilemma of property practitioners being bosses and customers has not changed much. Frankly speaking, cowards can't do this job, and the strong are unwilling to do it; Second, property management services are as unrepeatable as the battlefield. Different communities, different owners and different problems can't be pointed out by just a few "classics", but some people who have just filled in the blanks have been doing property services that decide their heads as soon as they come across the word "management". The above reasons have led developers to buy propaganda even if they are willing to spend money. From hope to disappointment, and then from disappointment to despair, the reputation of developers has vanished in the fart of "friends and relatives"!

In the subcontracting process of real estate construction, the wage arrears of migrant workers have become the only route for news anchors before the Spring Festival every year. Have high-ranking real estate developers ever thought about what this intentional or unintentional breach of contract will bring? Are honest migrant workers' brothers more concerned about their own income? Or do you care more about your own quality? This is a problem that cannot be verified, but from the feedback of the owner after taking over the house, the analysis of many quality problems faced by the property and even litigation, I am afraid that no one dares to fart like this in these so-called "problems left over from early development": "The house without salary is like this!"

Cycle after cycle, vicious circle I believe that buyers who are willing to "bittersweet" will become more and more sober and more resistant, and property is one of the social cells used to digest and face this reality, and practitioners are actors in this social drama. Are you satisfied with this statement?