Job Recruitment Website - Property management - Do you support canceling the management of property management companies and neighborhood committees?

Do you support canceling the management of property management companies and neighborhood committees?

Seeing such a topic, I am really a little in distress situation. Why do you want to cancel the property company and let the neighborhood Committee manage similar properties? Is it because the property management company is not doing well? Or is it because the neighborhood Committee is so well managed? We all say that professional things should be done by professional people, so property management should belong to property companies. Artificial hand neighborhood Committee, will this be better? I don't think such a proposal is good, and I object.

Let's take a look at what property management companies usually do. Property companies are responsible for various problems of residential buildings in their own property areas, such as roof leakage, pipeline blockage, street lamps not being lit, uneven roads, public health maintenance, etc. They rely on property fees to maintain their daily maintenance activities and personnel expenses. Of course, some property companies monitor the functions of vehicle management and security, and they also make some money from it. Generally speaking, property matters are handed over to property companies, which is called professional counterpart, and things can be solved effectively and pertinently.

The work to be done by neighborhood committees is to carry out various affairs of residents within their jurisdiction, including public security management, welfare support, governance, environmental sanitation, sports, women and children's work and so on. In the final analysis, this is their basic job, and what they have to do is to deal with people. They coordinate in a certain interpersonal relationship, thus promoting the harmony between people and residents in this area, ensuring a beautiful environment and establishing a harmonious community.

What is even more embarrassing is that now more and more people think that neighborhood committees are omnipotent. Everything can be solved when you get to the neighborhood Committee. The superior organization pushed the matter down to the neighborhood Committee, and the residents looked for the neighborhood Committee for everything. The epidemic came, the neighborhood Committee came out and rushed to the front line. As soon as the vaccine started, the neighborhood Committee mobilized everywhere. When the complaint comes, the neighborhood Committee must make a terminal response. Faced with such a measuring tool, people in neighborhood committees have a lot to say, which far exceeds their workload. If the property management company is really abolished and the property work is left to the neighborhood Committee, it will be unbearable for them and all kinds of work will not be done well. So this suggestion is not advisable.