My family has to install Unicom's network cable, and all the money has been paid, but the property manager has cut all the network cables in the building and can only install the radio and television

My family has to install Unicom's network cable, and all the money has been paid, but the property manager has cut all the network cables in the building and can only install the radio and television network designated by him. This is a new building. This is the disadvantage of monopoly industries at present. This can't be blamed on the industry or telecom or netcom. Blame it on this system. Although telecom and netcom have monopoly systems, they turn a blind eye. As long as one broadband enters by default, another company will ignore the anti-monopoly law and will not maintain industry competition according to the anti-monopoly law. Directly facing the senses, the interests of the owners and other broadband companies may be directly damaged, but in fact, the ultimate loss is the owners themselves.

Under normal circumstances, developers or property companies will discuss broadband matters with broadband companies after the establishment of new residential areas and sign exclusive contracts (this is a violation of the anti-monopoly law and can be considered as invalid contracts). According to the proposal upstairs, it is best to set up an owners' committee to drive out such property enterprises that harm the interests of owners. Then find a new broadband to enter, so that the broadband company that signed the contract can't sue the status quo, and its contract is illegal and invalid. There is no reason to sue you. The only reason is that he laid the pipeline himself and didn't let other companies take his pipeline.