Does it constitute a crime to affect the normal life order of others?

If it's not serious, it's just administrative security punishment. The crime of gathering people to disturb public places and traffic order refers to a serious act of gathering people to disturb public places and traffic order, resisting or obstructing state security managers from performing their duties according to law.

People's Republic of China (PRC) Public Security Administration Punishment Law

Chapter III Acts and Penalties for Violation of Public Security Administration

Article 23

One of the following acts, a warning or a fine of two hundred yuan; If the circumstances are serious, they shall be detained for not less than five days but not more than ten days, and may also be fined not more than 500 yuan.

(1) Disrupting the order of organs, organizations, enterprises and institutions, resulting in work, production, business, medical treatment, teaching and scientific research not being carried out normally, but causing no serious losses; ?

(2) disturbing the order of stations, ports, docks, airports, shopping malls, parks, exhibition halls or other public places;

(3) disturbing the order on buses, trams, trains, ships, aircraft or other public transport;

(four) illegal interception or forced boarding, boarding motor vehicles, ships, aircraft and other means of transportation, affecting the normal running of vehicles;

(5) disturbing the election order conducted according to law. Whoever gathers people to commit the acts mentioned in the preceding paragraph shall be detained for more than 10 days and less than 15 days, and may also be fined less than 1,000 yuan.

Article 24

One of the following acts, disrupting the order of large-scale mass activities such as culture and sports, shall be given a warning or a fine of not more than 200 yuan; If the circumstances are serious, they shall be detained for more than five days and less than ten days, and may be fined up to five hundred yuan:

(1) forcibly entering the meeting place;

(two) in violation of regulations, fireworks or other items in the venue;

(three) display insulting slogans, banners and other items;

(4) Besieging referees, athletes or other staff members;

(five) throwing debris into the venue, not listening to stop;

(six) other acts that disrupt the order of large-scale mass activities. Those who are detained and punished for disturbing the order of sports competitions may also be ordered not to enter sports venues to watch similar competitions within 12 months; Those who enter the stadium illegally are forcibly taken away from the scene.

Extended data:

Case:

The owner of the residential area changed the residence to commercial use privately, which affected the normal living order of the residential area and infringed on the legitimate rights and interests of other owners and property management departments, and undoubtedly had to bear corresponding responsibilities.

However, in rural areas and even some small cities, similar public welfare disputes, litigation will not become the first choice for safeguarding rights. In the traditional concept, a lawsuit will escalate the dispute. Living together in a community, everyone bowed their heads and did not look up. If the owners' committee cannot act as a spokesman for the collective interests, few people are willing to fight a lawsuit with their neighbors.

If we consider the litigation cost again, this way of safeguarding rights will only become the last choice. What's more, behind this seemingly simple legal dispute, there are some more complicated social problems hidden. For example, the imbalance of educational resources between urban and rural areas, the emergence of a large number of small town trusteeship classes, although there is a lack of family supervision, but more is a helpless realistic choice.

People's Daily-People's Daily: Don't let non-litigation become powerless