Property companies unilaterally set high market management fees for shops, and they will not be allowed to open their doors to do business without paying them. It is difficult to realize agreement pri

Property companies unilaterally set high market management fees for shops, and they will not be allowed to open their doors to do business without paying them. It is difficult to realize agreement pricing in reality. What should we do? The market management fee is managed by the local industrial and commercial bureau and the price bureau. You can go there to consult and reflect the problem, or you can go to the government website to consult and reflect it.

"When can we introduce a policy to really solve this problem?" We should have confidence, because the situation is urgent and time waits for no one, and the policy is changing in a good direction.

Moreover, property management companies serve owners and customers, and the unilateral establishment of management fees is only a temporary phenomenon. After the establishment of the property meeting and industry committee, the management fees of shops and properties belonging to the owners' public property are decided by the owners' meeting, and the property cannot be decided by itself. At the same time, it must be reviewed and approved by relevant government departments before it can become the charging standard. If the ownership of the shop property belongs to the development enterprise of the property company, it also needs the approval of the price bureau.

I think that when small and medium-sized enterprises all over China have their own "trade organizations", such as chambers of commerce and federations, it will also promote the standardization of market-oriented games, and the problem of enterprises uniting to form a force to resist market management fees will not be solved. At present, the actual situation is that the above-mentioned policies are often not very specific, and all localities have the right to formulate local policies and implementation rules, which has also caused ambiguous relations between local enterprises and some government officials and hindered the healthy development of marketization.