The renewal contract signed by the industry Committee and the property is only publicized in the community and does not vote. Is it effective?

According to the Property Management Regulations of the State Council and the Rules of Procedure for Owners' Congress of the Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development, you described that the industry committee took the lead in convening the owners' congress or owners' congress, but you may not have attended. As long as all owners or owners' representatives account for more than half of the construction area and all owners or owners' representatives have the right to vote, the decision to renew the original property company is passed by voting, which is binding on all owners and users. As the executive body of the owners' meeting, it is completely reasonable, legal and compliant for the industry committee to sign the property service contract with the property company according to the resolution of the owners' meeting, and there is no problem in filing with the government department. Moreover, the industry Committee publicized all the contents of the contract. According to China's contract law, the contract cannot be publicized. The industry Committee has always been very transparent and accepts the supervision of the owners of the community. The change of public revenue share ratio is because the operating labor costs of property companies are increasing every year, but the property fees paid by owners have not increased. Property companies are unprofitable and may even lose money. The reasonable expense account of the property company has been approved by the owners' meeting. In order not to increase the burden on the owners, the owners' congress and the industry committee can only sacrifice part of public income to subsidize the lack of funds for the management cost of the property company. If the owners' meeting does not give in, the property company may not continue to manage your community and refuse to renew the contract. The signing of the contract is originally a two-way choice. If you change the property management company, the new property management company may not take over your community according to the service requirements after costing under the same contract conditions. Moreover, the relationship between the new property company and the industry Committee is not necessarily good, and it is not necessarily a good thing to change the property company, and the property service may be getting worse and worse. There may be no property management company to manage the community. This situation is very common in China. Weighing the pros and cons, I think the owners' meeting and industry committee of your community have done a very good job, and the property service contract is true and effective.