Do you agree if the property is cancelled and turned into public welfare community service? Why?

I support canceling the property and turning it into public welfare community service. Many people are in favor of canceling the property, mainly because the property work in the community is too unsatisfactory. Nowadays, many properties do nothing but collect property fees, which is very overbearing. If the owner doesn't pay the property fee, it is common to cut off water and electricity. Nowadays, many high-rise buildings use credit cards to go upstairs and downstairs. If they don't pay the property fee, they can only climb the building without swiping their cards.

Some property services have a poor attitude, and there is no awareness of serving the owners of the community. They are more like yamen than yamen. Some properties post advertisements in public places or residential elevators for profit, which has nothing to do with the owners. Whether the property is good or not depends on the greening, maintenance, safety and hygiene of the community. In many properties, greening is basically not done, and maintenance has to be urged by the owners many times, let alone sanitation. Many walls are covered with stains and no one cleans them.

Cancellation of property is not the purpose. In the final analysis, as a community owner, I hope that the service facilities in my community are perfect in all aspects, giving people a warm and comfortable home.

I support the cancellation of the property. If it becomes public service, I would like to sign up as a volunteer.

There are too many unpopular property companies all over the country, mainly because of high fees and poor service quality. Some property companies have bad social phenomena of bullying the market and harassing owners.

The property was originally for the owners, but now it has become the ancestors of the owners, and the parking spaces are also sold for money. If you sell the money, you have to charge a parking space for health management. Why is it so expensive?

It is suggested to cancel the property and only keep the sanitation and cleaning fees and garbage clearing fees, which involves the management of other maintenance and repairs that should be paid by children in the community.

Today's property is worse than Yamenkou. I don't know how the property in developed countries is managed. Welcome friends who know about real estate in developed countries to leave a message for discussion.

Agree to cancel the property, some property companies have outstanding problems such as unauthorized construction and arbitrary charges in the community, and even collusion between internal and external to steal from the owners and bully them from time to time. Their service is not good, but they try their best to make money by charging. Now the property is just being cleaned up. So there is no need to raise a property in the community. Some jobs are outsourced to save money and worry.

I totally agree that the property should be cancelled and managed by the community. Because property management is an enterprise, with profit as its purpose and service based on profit, when there is a conflict between service and profit, property management will give up service. Now some properties are pursuing and safeguarding their own interests, and some behaviors are underworld.

The cancellation of property will cancel the interests of some people who take the economy as their interests! Can fully mobilize the enthusiasm of all sectors of society and actively serve the people. The whole society will serve the people, and the ideological communication and initiative will be better, and the social atmosphere will be more solid.

Obviously, it serves the owners, but now it encroaches on the interests of the owners' community (elevator advertising fees, outdoor advertising fees, parking fees, rental of property houses, setting up express boxes in the community and other public welfare). Nowadays, many properties are idle people in society and have the nature of underworld forces. It is suggested to cancel the property and hand it over to the community management.

Many people are dissatisfied with the services provided by the property management companies in their communities, which is a common problem. Property charges are high, opaque, the service quality is poor and the attitude is overbearing. Often threatened by water, electricity and gas cuts, it is criticized by the society.

Since the property management company is hired and employed by the owner to serve the owner, it should be a master-slave relationship. Why is it so high above the customer? Therefore, the government's management in this respect cannot be absent. The contradiction between the owner and the property is prominent and chaotic. There is an urgent need to strengthen management and improve the system, which is a major event around the people.

I think the proposal to cancel the property and turn it into public welfare community service is completely feasible. Community public service is a unified service with the same standards. Residents in all communities can enjoy the same services if the government subsidizes them properly. At the same time, it can reduce residents' expenses, reduce costs and save a lot of money a year. Take the community where I live as an example. I live in a house of more than 90 square meters, and I have to pay the property fee near 200 yuan every month. Ordinary people think it is a great burden. If we can implement community public services, it will also increase our income in disguise and improve our sense of happiness.

I agree. Property companies aim at making profits. Generally speaking, the quality of the staff they recruit is not high, the service is not good, and there are often contradictions and conflicts with the owners. Some communities charge too much, which increases the economic pressure of owners.

Agree to cancel the property and become a community public service. The essence of property is profit-making, while community public service is non-profit public welfare paid service.