Is it the responsibility of the property to lose things?

Legal analysis: the property in the community is also responsible for losing things, but it is necessary to call the police at the first time to let the police coordinate the handling, but the property cannot bear all the responsibilities. If you forget to close the doors and windows for your own reasons, it is difficult to recover the lost things and find a property to deal with. Generally, there are cameras in the community, so you can ask the property department for mediation and control. If you really stole it, give the video to the police. now

Legal basis: Article 200 of the Civil Procedure Law of People's Republic of China (PRC), if the application of a party meets one of the following circumstances, the people's court shall try again: (1) there is new evidence enough to overturn the original judgment or ruling; (two) the basic facts identified in the original judgment or ruling lack evidence to prove; (3) The main evidence of the facts ascertained in the original judgment or ruling is forged; (four) the main evidence of the facts identified in the original judgment or ruling has not been cross-examined; (five) the main evidence needed for the trial of the case, the parties can not collect it by themselves due to objective reasons, and apply in writing to the people's court for investigation and collection, but the people's court has not investigated and collected it; (6) The application of the law in the original judgment or ruling is indeed wrong; (seven) the composition of the judicial organization is illegal or the judges who should be avoided according to law have not avoided; (8) A person without capacity for litigation has no legal representative, or a party who should participate in the litigation fails to participate in the litigation due to reasons not attributable to him or his agent ad litem. (nine) in violation of the law, depriving the parties of the right to debate; (ten) without a summons, the judgment is made by default; (eleven) the original judgment or ruling omitted or exceeded the claim; (twelve) the legal documents on which the original judgment or ruling was based have been revoked or changed; (thirteen) the judge has corruption, bribery, favoritism, perverting the law in the trial of the case.