What if life balcony Property says it doesn't agree?

Ways to deal with disputes over property refusal to seal balconies: negotiation, mediation, alarm, prosecution, court decision, etc. Under specific circumstances, matters related to disputes between owners belong to civil litigation and can be handled and identified in accordance with the above provisions.

First, what is the way to deal with the dispute that the property does not allow the balcony to be sealed?

How to deal with disputes over closed balconies is not allowed;

1. Be settled through friendly negotiation.

2. Resolve through various mediations.

3, through the police station to solve.

4. Civil litigation settlement.

Second, the relevant provisions of the owner's dispute handling

The Supreme People's Court's Interpretation on Several Issues Concerning the Specific Application of Law in the Trial of Property Service Disputes.

Article 4

The people's court shall support the owners to violate the realty service contract or laws, regulations and management regulations and implement acts that hinder the realty service and management, and the realty service enterprise shall request the owners to bear corresponding civil liabilities such as restoring the original state, stopping the infringement and eliminating the obstruction.

Article 5

If a realty service enterprise violates the stipulations of the realty service contract or the provisions of laws, regulations and departmental rules and regulations, without authorization, expands the charging scope, raises the charging standard or charges repeatedly, and the owner raises a defense on the grounds of illegal charging, the people's court shall support it.

The people's court shall support the owners' request to the realty service enterprise to refund the illegal fees charged by them.

Article 6

If the owner refuses to pay the property fee without justifiable reasons or fails to pay the property fee within a reasonable period after being urged in writing, and the property service enterprise requests the owner to pay the property fee, the people's court shall support it. Property service enterprises have provided services in accordance with the contract and relevant regulations, and the people's court will not support the owners' defense on the grounds that they do not enjoy or need to accept relevant property services.

Article 7 If the owner and the lessee, borrower or other user of the property agree that the user of the property will pay the property fee, and the property service enterprise requests the owner to bear joint liability, the people's court shall support it.

Article 8 If the owners' committee requests to terminate the realty service contract after the owners' general meeting has made a decision to dismiss the realty service enterprise in accordance with the procedures stipulated in Article 76 of the Property Law, the people's court shall support it.

Where a property service enterprise claims property fees from the owners' committee, the people's court shall inform it to claim rights from the owners who are in arrears with property fees.

Ninth after the termination of the rights and obligations of the realty service contract, the owners request the realty service enterprise to refund the property fees that have been received in advance but have not yet provided the realty service, and the people's court shall support it.

Where a realty service enterprise requires the owner to pay the property fee in arrears, it shall be handled in accordance with the provisions of Article 6 of this Interpretation.

Article 10

After the termination of the rights and obligations of the realty service contract, if the owners' committee requests the realty service enterprise to withdraw from the realty service area and hand over the realty service place and related facilities, as well as the relevant materials necessary for realty service and the special maintenance funds entrusted by it, the people's court shall support it.

After the termination of the rights and obligations of the property service contract, if the property service enterprise refuses to withdraw or hand over and requests the owner to pay the property fee on the grounds that there is a de facto property service relationship, the people's court will not support it.

Under normal circumstances, the property is not allowed to close the balcony according to the relevant management regulations, and the owner should cooperate with the implementation according to the actual situation. If there is a property dispute, it needs to be determined according to the actual dispute and reasons. First, an agreement should be reached through negotiation. If no agreement can be reached, it can be submitted to the court for handling.