Now there are more and more calls from all over the country to cancel the property. What do netizens think about this?

Resolutely support the abolition of property, add strength to neighborhood committees, assume the responsibility of property, and let this "serving the people" institution run under the leadership of the party, instead of just taking money and not doing things as it is now.

In the past, there was no property in the community, and residents could not survive. Now that we have a property, most people are complaining. Resolutely cancel the property.

If the policy really cancels the property, I will definitely support it with both hands.

The reason is that since the emergence of the new property industry, various negative phenomena have emerged in an endless stream and become increasingly fierce.

In itself, the management of residential property has not been recognized by most owners. In this unwilling and reluctant situation, the owner put all his sovereignty on a foreign service provider, which shows that the owner can be in such a good mood. And now the property, his own culture and self-cultivation are mixed, and most property managers are still unknown. Owners must have low expectations for them!

In contrast, in the past, if rich people or capitalists needed a housekeeper at home, they were all invited by relatives and friends, but the premise was that in the old society, good character, high education and good quality were all necessary conditions for a housekeeper, and finally they could become a real housekeeper after being tested by their host's family!

However, after the liberation of New China, the street management in every city has implemented the government management system, that is, the street director is responsible for it. At that time, there were only two directors in the neighborhood Committee, one each. Their daily work is responsible for street hygiene inspection and public safety. This burden was finally appointed by the street office with the consent of the street residents, but the directors of neighborhood committees in those years were all borne by housewives in those years. The premise is that the roots are red seedlings and the working people are born. Under such circumstances, the directors of urban neighborhood committees all over the country. Moreover, the director of the neighborhood Committee at that time earned less and was particularly hard! They should not only help residents collect water and electricity charges, but also supervise cleaners to clean the streets. At the same time, they also develop street-run enterprises, which is a burden! I think the position of street director in those days was really not for anyone who wanted to do it! But it is also widely welcomed and respected by residents, but its characteristics are that residents spend less money and the service is absolutely in place!

However, the current property management personnel, do they have the ability of the director of the neighborhood Committee? But after living in the community, are the services they do in place? How is the service attitude? For these problems, the majority of owners are well aware! But the pain is nowhere to tell!

Of course, among them, the property management services of some high-end residential areas in cities all over the country must keep up! Because the identity of the owner living in a high-end residential area is different, he is rich and powerful. In this case, does his property manager dare to provide poor service? Moreover, the charging standard of high-grade residential areas is still high. Can residents in ordinary communities compare with others?

Finally, my personal opinion is that property management depends on the living standards of residents in the community. The management of ordinary residential areas is led by the street office, and the government appoints staff to live in it. The advantage of this is that it not only stabilizes the living problems of residents, but also solves the employment problem of college students. But for high-end residential areas in the city, it is most suitable for property managers to serve!

The property should be cancelled. Real estate is a very strange industry. First of all, ordinary people don't know what property management is. Ordinary people pay property fees according to the living area of the house, but the indoor equipment of ordinary people, such as water, heating, electricity, roof, walls and ground, are managed by ordinary people themselves. So why pay the property fee according to the living area? Secondly, the original intention of property design is to serve people's life, residence and environment. But now, like government agencies, there are many cadres in the property, such as managers, directors and supervisors. Originally, residents supported it, but when they met residents, they were arrogant and ugly, and things were difficult to handle. This has put a spell on the heads of ordinary people, which is not good at all. Third, it is easy to solve some problems for residents and even charge high fees. It's like a bunch of moths. Fourth, in the past, the environment, sanitation and greening of residential areas were managed by streets. With years of management experience, they should continue to manage. I don't know why we need to set up a special property. As a result, the people complained bitterly and the people were miserable.

The property fee was unreasonable at first, but the salary of property personnel was poor and the property fee was high. Owners basically spend wasted money. A community's income of millions a year falls into personal pockets and becomes a tool for the interest chain to collect money. Finally, the owner becomes the object of oppression. Cancel it quickly. Organize industry committees to openly and reasonably charge reasonable fees.

Property fees belong to the overlord clause and are compulsory consumption. 2.5 yuan is charged per square meter every month. Why? Except for the elevator fee, other so-called "services" have not been approved by the owner. The property fee of the old community is several hundred yuan a year. Why does a new community need thousands of dollars?

To cancel the property service company is a bit of a waste of food because of choking. Instead of calling for killing, it is better to call on the state to encourage and support the popularization of owners' committees, so that owners can give full play to their subjective initiative, choose appropriate property service agencies independently, manage their own owners with low quality and ignore public interests, which can also solve the problem of a legal subject; At the same time, speed up legislation, clarify the positioning and rights boundaries of property companies, put a halter on wayward property companies, and don't let unscrupulous property companies turn the main body upside down, treat themselves as masters, treat the owners and property service areas as Tang monks' meat, and chew as they want, which is audacious and reckless.

Due to the market economy, in the absence of supervision and self-discipline, property companies pursue economic interests excessively, making them basically violent industries. At the same time, with the enhancement of owners' awareness of rights protection, conflicts of interest will inevitably arise. In fact, the owners are fully capable of self-management, so I think the time is ripe to cancel the property, support the lifting of the ban on the property and realize the autonomy of the owners! ! !

Property is the parasite of the owner. Because public security is the duty of the police station, politics is the duty of the neighborhood Committee, and water, water, gas and sanitation are all managed by professional companies. Property management really shouldn't exist, and it shouldn't just collect money and not serve.

If the property can really serve the owner, just keep it for the owner!

But what's the use of a property if it only collects property fees and does nothing or fails to do anything? !