One will pay 654.38+0.2 billion yuan, and the other will be removed. Will it be the next one to be punished?

In the case of Lin Shengbin, nine units, including Greentown Property Company, paid a sky-high compensation of 654.38+0.2 billion yuan for violating the Fire Protection Law.

Taking Didi Chuxing as an example, Didi Chuxing was directly ordered to be taken off the shelves as soon as it was listed, because it violated the network security law. Small programs were stopped one after another, and the stock plummeted by over 10%, resulting in heavy losses.

In a society ruled by law, enterprises can't abide by the law and will pay a heavy price for their actions.

Recently, we have customers in the digital printing industry who have reported that the "Easy Remote Service" launched by F Company may also have hidden dangers similar to Didi.

According to official website, the customer's equipment status, maintenance and counter information will be sent directly to the headquarters of F Company through the Internet, and then the service team will monitor and analyze the data, thus providing timely and effective services.

But in this way, the contents of the documents scanned and printed by customers and the time and place of using the equipment are also collected by F company? Does this practice meet the legal requirements of our country?

It is not known for the time being whether this practice of Company F is illegal, but we can see from the data of Tianyan that there were 4,278 lawsuits before Company F ... Among them, both Company F sued users and many users sued Company F for product quality.

As a multinational giant in the field of digital printing, F Company has reached the world leading position in the market share of digital color printing equipment.

But it is such an enterprise that, in a short period of five years, thousands of legal disputes occurred with other domestic printing enterprises due to its equipment contract and other issues, resulting in losses and bankruptcy of more than 200 other small and medium-sized enterprises!

We integrate the problems provided by our customers in the cooperation with F Company into the following list, which is clear at a glance. We believe that justice is free from people's hearts:

1. rarely give customers contracts.

Companies that have dealt with Company F know that if they buy machines from them, as long as they sign the contract, they will take them away for various reasons, even without giving us a backup opportunity.

Therefore, when it comes to fulfilling the contract, what was stipulated at the beginning and whether they fulfilled it according to the agreement have all become "dead men tell no tales."

You know, the most important thing when defending rights is evidence. The judge won't listen to you crying with a runny nose and tears, but only look at the documents you can get. This practice of company F is to completely cut off the lives of other enterprises in the first step of safeguarding rights.

At the beginning of last year, a company wanted to sue Company F for its promise of "free printing until May 30" in the illegal agreement, but it could not bring a lawsuit because of lack of contract evidence.

Company F continued to sit on the throne of his industry, but this small company was forced to close down.

2. Concealing the quality problem of the machine and being suspected of false propaganda.

Customers often choose their equipment through F company's exquisite brochure introduction. But just like an old woman's cake has no wife, and Master Kong's beef noodles have no Master Kong, the equipment of Company F is not as good as it advertised.

In fact, the bosses of many small printing companies are not experts in printers. Their performance depends on the introduction of the sales staff of F company, and there is no quality problem in installation.

Company F saw this gap and prevented its sales representatives from explaining to users in advance that there were irreparable problems in the quality of the machine. When it was discovered later, it was commercial fraud to find various reasons to shirk responsibility!

3. Stop taking the medicine at will and pay the fee.

Facing the machine quality problems raised by customers, what F Company is best at is the four no policies-no reply, no maintenance, no negotiation and no solution. However, it never stops charging.

In the dispute between S company and it company, F company stopped providing services to S company in August 1 9, but sent a service fee invoice three months later, demanding to pay the service fee of more than 9000 yuan for these three months.

Ironically, from the point of view of the contract, if we don't pay this fee, S Company will be liable for millions of compensation. This is its genius. This is a blatant violation of the law, but you can't sue him.

There are many similar incidents. Behind every case, it is not only the years of hard work of a small company, but also the joys and sorrows of countless families.

We don't know if company F will be punished by law like Didi.

But we firmly believe that justice will be late but not absent, and the law will finally give us an explanation!