Xi 'an's owners manage this community, with a profit of 830,000 yuan a year. How did he do it?

The annual income of Xi 'an owner's self-managed community is 830,000 yuan. This is done by this community. They did not hire a special property management company, but only hired professional cleaning and financial staff under the leadership of the owners' Committee. There is no property management company, and the owners' committee is basically responsible for the comprehensive management of the community. Most things in the community are decided by the owners' Committee. For example, the advertising space in the community is rented, and so on. In the past, most of these profitable projects were counted in the income of the property, which was pure profit. But there is no property now, and the money belongs to all owners of the community.

In addition, the property fees collected by the community will be much more than the expenses for the staff, plus deducting some unexpected losses within the scope. This part of the money, plus the cost of renting advertising space in the community and even some parking fees, and the balance, the owners' Committee will buy some rice and peanut oil as welfare to the owners according to the number of owners. I have to say that the owner of this community is responsible, which is a precedent for community management. The satisfaction of the owners is almost 100%, which shows that the self-management community is successful and effective.

Xi 'an's owner managed the residential area and made a profit of 830,000 yuan. After this incident spread on the internet, netizens were shocked, and they could actually make a net profit before the real estate, with an annual income of one million yuan. Many owners are simply stunned. Many netizens have said that it is recommended to promote the self-management community model of Xi' an Heping Garden and completely cancel it. Uncle? General properties.

The contradiction between the property and the owner is very deep. In the final analysis, the property did not find its own position when providing services to the owners. In the eyes of the owners, the property is only the service personnel hired by the owners to manage the community. However, the staff of the property feel that they are here to manage the community and are above the owners, which leads to the contradiction between the owners and the property, which is almost infinite. The current self-management community can have such a good effect and should be promoted.