Tesla is forbidden to enter a residential area in Lanzhou. Do you support the practice of property management?

I don't support the practice of property management, but I don't object either. Tesla's rights protection incident caused by brake failure, coupled with the recent frequent Tesla vehicle accidents, has made people always question Tesla's braking problem and even become a stalk. Some areas have also taken relevant measures.

A certain district in Lanzhou hangs a sign directly at the door: Tesla is forbidden to enter. A few days ago, some netizens broke the news and posted it at the door of a community in Chengguan District, Lanzhou, Gansu. Tesla is a restricted area? Signboard. Judging from the content exposed through the network, the signboard is directly attached to the pillar of the community gate, with Tesla's logo printed on it, which looks very eye-catching, and people in the past can easily notice the content.

After the report spread on the Internet, a reporter contacted the residential property and asked about the specific situation. The property staff said that they hung up according to the leadership arrangement. Now other vehicles can pass normally, and Tesla can't enter the community now.

The reporter then asked about the relevant reasons. The staff said that the specific reasons are still unclear, but since the signboard has been posted, it must be observed.

I don't quite support the practice of property management, but I can't say I'm against it. The reason why I don't support it is because I think it should have no legal significance for the property to post such a notice unilaterally. If there is a Tesla owner in the community, driving home is his right, and the property has no right to stop it. Unilateral announcement or announcement of this kind of property can easily lead to contradictions and conflicts between the owners and the property.

As a community owner, I am actually very dissatisfied with the unilateral posting of such content on the property. Unless the opinions of most owners are consulted, it is difficult to get the approval of the owners.

However, from another angle, I am not opposed to the practice of property management. Because of the frequent vehicle accidents in Tesla recently, I also question whether there are quality problems in Tesla's brakes. The reason why the residential property does this may also be that the vehicle is out of control in the residential area, which will bring more trouble to the owners and the property.

If analyzed from this angle, the practice of the property can also be said to be responsible for the safety of the owners. Although this kind of self-assertion is unacceptable, it is not too annoying.

In fact, our speculation and evaluation of real estate behavior is meaningless. As long as the community owners are not dissatisfied with this, the practice of the property will not be questioned. Just what caused the residential property to do this, I am still very curious. But this has nothing to do with us. Let's take Tesla's follow-up reaction automatically.