The man turned on the air conditioner in the window to water the flowers. Unfortunately, he fell to his death. His wife claimed property compensation. Should the property be compensated?

Although the man's behavior is incorrect and he should bear the main responsibility, I think the property also has secondary responsibility.

"Ah, give it back to my husband!" A middle-aged woman was lying on the ground crying loudly, her legs pedaling from time to time. Every time she pedaled, the decibel of her voice was a little higher, and the hysterical appearance attracted passers-by. The place where she cried was the property door of a community. Soon the reporter heard the news and felt the scene and comforted the woman. After that, the woman's mood gradually calmed down and began to tell reporters the whole story.

Ms. Wang is a resident of the community. Her husband, Mr. Shen, usually likes to grow flowers, but there is no special place to grow flowers because of the small space at home. Mr. Shen put several pots of flowers on the air-conditioned table with air conditioner outside. Every day, Mr. Shen waters these potted flowers and turns over the soil, but because there is no special access to the air conditioning station, he needs to turn them out through the bathroom window to operate the flowers.

One day, Mr. Shen got up in the morning and told his wife that he would move two pots of flowers today, so he turned them out of the bathroom window. When my wife was half asleep, she suddenly heard a metal crash. The sudden sound woke her from her sleep. She went to every room for the first time to find her husband, but nothing came of it. Finally, I went to the bathroom and looked down to find that my husband had fallen downstairs.

Ms. Wang put on her coat and hurried downstairs. Her daughter also heard the sound and rushed downstairs with her mother. According to Ms. Wang, at that time, her husband was conscious, and her daughter called him dad and nodded. However, after the ambulance arrived, it was found that Mr. Wang had no vital signs and declared his death directly.

The death of her husband left Ms. Wang and her daughter in despair. It seems that the sky is falling, and I don't know how to spend the rest of my life. Ms. Wang looked at the air-conditioning platform guardrail scattered on the ground and suddenly thought of her husband's death. The property should also bear part of the responsibility, because the guardrail of the air-conditioning platform was not strong enough, which directly led to her husband falling from the building, so the opening scene happened.

Ms. Wang thinks her husband is thin and light. If the property can regularly repair and reinforce the guardrail of the air conditioning station, such a tragedy will not happen. Therefore, she believes that the property is responsible for the accident and hopes that the property can make compensation.

In order to appease Ms. Wang's emotions, the reporter accompanied Ms. Wang to the property and found the relevant person in charge. However, the person in charge of the property said that the accident had nothing to do with them, because Ms. Wang's family had never cooperated with the work of the property, and the property had reminded them many times about planting flowers at the air conditioning station. Except for Ms. Wang's family, none of the 33 households in the whole building grow flowers on the air-conditioning platform. Ms. Wang's family turned a blind eye to the reminder of the property, which eventually led to the accident.

Secondly, the guardrail standard of air-conditioning platform is different from that of balcony, and it can't bear the weight of an adult, so the property thinks there is no responsibility in this accident. The reporter consulted relevant lawyers. Lawyers said that the property did not bear the primary responsibility or even secondary responsibility in this incident, because the role of air conditioning is not to grow flowers. Ms. Wang's family made a mistake first, which eventually led to the accident. They should bear the main responsibility, but for humanitarian reasons, the property can be compensated accordingly, but the relevant departments need to test the quality of air-conditioning guardrails to determine the compensation ratio.

Judging from the responsibility of this accident, I think the property has a secondary responsibility, and the maintenance of residential facilities is also one of the important tasks of the property, but this work is often ignored by the property company. If the property company can regularly check the condition of the air-conditioning guardrail, perhaps such a tragedy will not happen. Although the property is not the main responsibility in these accidents, I think they still have to bear the secondary responsibility.

Do you think the property should compensate Ms. Wang Welcome to leave a message in the comments section.