In Kunshan, Jiangsu, there was a conflict between the property and the owner, threatening to beat the owner. How did the police handle it?

"The property hit people!" In Kunshan, Jiangsu, there was a contradiction between the owner and a residential area. A staff member threatened to beat the owner with iron bars, fire extinguishers and fire axes. In addition, several other security guards also participated in the siege. Afterwards, the owners also arrogantly threatened to "sell the house if I can't pass it, that's the strength!" At present, relevant departments have been involved in the investigation, and five security guards who beat people have been fired.

This is too arrogant! Do these properties and security guards regard the community as a new address? Who gave these people such great confidence? Don't forget, you are a service provider, not a gangster, not a gangster.

Why is there a contradiction between the property and the owner? We don't know whether it is because of fees or management. But it can be seen from the fierce attitude and practice of the property. The owner paid the property fee, but he ran wild on the owner's head. What else?

It is obviously illegal for property personnel to beat the owners, even suspected of constituting a crime. According to Article 43 of the Law on Public Security Administration Punishment, anyone who beats others shall be detained for 5- 10 and fined. If, after identification, the victim's injury reaches more than minor injuries, and the hitter is suspected of intentional injury, he is generally sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years. In addition, five security guards attacked the owner with iron bars, fire extinguishers and fire axes, which was not as simple as shooting. Their behavior has been suspected of committing a crime.

The behavior of five people belongs to beating others at will with a murder weapon and beating others at will in a public place, causing serious disorder in public places, which should be considered as "bad circumstances" and suspected of constituting the crime of stirring up trouble. Whoever commits this crime shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than five years, criminal detention or public surveillance.

From a civil point of view, according to Article 937 of the Civil Law, a property service contract is a contract in which the property service provider provides property services such as management and maintenance for the owner in the property service area, and the owner pays the property fee. Property owners are invited to provide services to protect their safety, not to bully others.

This kind of property management with no service at all is a serious incompetence and a serious breach of contract, which cannot be rectified. It is better to terminate it as soon as possible. According to Article 946 of the General Principles of the Civil Law, if the owner decides to dismiss the property service provider according to legal procedures, the property service contract may be terminated. The next decision is in the hands of the owner. As a property management company and staff, don't forget your identity, don't put the cart before the horse, or you will leave!

What do you think of this?