Job Recruitment Website - Property management - Who will bear the cost of secondary pipe network reconstruction?

Who will bear the cost of secondary pipe network reconstruction?

Who will bear the cost of secondary pipe network reconstruction?

According to the Regulations on Urban Water Supply and Water Saving Management and the Regulations on Property Management and other relevant laws and regulations, the cost of secondary pipe network reconstruction shall be borne by the owner or the property management company. Specifically, if the secondary pipe network transformation is caused by the fault or negligence of the owner or the property management company, then the cost should be borne by the owner or the property management company; If it is caused by other reasons, such as government policy adjustment or natural disasters and other force majeure factors, then the expenses should be borne by the relevant responsible parties.

It should be noted that due to the influence of regions, policies and other factors, the specific cost-bearing methods may be different. Therefore, before the reconstruction of the secondary pipe network, we must first understand the local policies and regulations, and negotiate with relevant parties to determine the specific way to bear the cost. The cost of secondary pipe network reconstruction is usually borne by the owner or developer. After the house is delivered for use, when the secondary pipe network needs to be rebuilt due to problems, the owner or developer should bear the corresponding expenses. This is because the secondary pipe network belongs to the ancillary facilities of the house and needs to be maintained and updated to ensure the normal use and safety of the house.

However, if the secondary pipe network reconstruction is carried out because of the mandatory requirements of the government or the needs of public interests, then the government or relevant institutions may bear part or all of the costs. In this case, the owner or developer needs to negotiate with the government or relevant institutions to solve the cost sharing problem according to the specific situation.

finally

To sum up, the cost of the secondary pipe network transformation should be borne by the owner or the property management company. The specific mode of commitment needs to be determined according to the actual situation and relevant policies. Before the transformation of the secondary pipe network, we must first understand the local policies and regulations and negotiate with relevant parties to determine the specific cost-bearing methods.

legal ground

Article 20 of the Regulations on Urban Water Supply and Water Saving stipulates: "The cost of construction, renovation and maintenance of urban water supply network shall be borne by the water supply unit."

Article 53 of the Property Management Regulations stipulates: "If the owner needs to decorate the house, he shall inform the property service enterprise in advance. The property service enterprise shall inform the owner of the prohibited acts and precautions in the house decoration. "

Article 41 of "Regulations on Quality Management of Construction Projects" stipulates: "If there are quality problems in the warranty scope and warranty period of construction projects, the construction unit shall fulfill the warranty obligations and be responsible for the losses caused."