Views on entering the real estate industry

This problem is the biggest contradiction between property and owners since the property industry entered China.

The boss paid them to come in and serve instead of managing us. This can't be done, that is not allowed, and some even use it for personal gain and personal enrichment. This is too ugly to eat.

The property company failed to maintain the public area of the park according to the contents of the property service contract, failed to let the owners feel the service of the property on a daily basis, failed to visit the owners, and some even failed to confirm whether the property was the owner. How can such a property be said?

Property is definitely a service, and it is handled according to the property contract. However, the government is not allowed to build sun rooms, nor is it allowed to violate the rules. The property was blocked for the unity of the facade of the whole community.

As a service enterprise, property must abide by the administrative requirements and verbal orders of government units and departments at all levels. Urban management, greening office, community and other departments that have the most contact will express their management opinions and actions in accordance with the requirements of government decrees, so the property will also be called management, which is actually a management action implemented on behalf of the government.

Many times, what the property industry does, such as dealing with illegal buildings, will lead to the existence of property as a backburner because of the vague legal boundaries and some laws and regulations. For example, the handling of illegal construction must be punished by the urban management department, but only the property is required to be implemented in accordance with the behavior of "discovering, dissuading, stopping and reporting". But among them, if there is a conflict in the action to be stopped, shall I go through it or let go if I can't stop it?

If it goes through to the end, my employees will be hurt. If it can't be stopped, it will be released and the park will be more difficult to manage.

The management of boundaries makes services more difficult to understand.

In fact, both the property and the owner are the considerations of their respective holders, which is just a conflict between two groups that safeguard their own interests.

It is nothing more than a struggle for a sense of border between the two sides.

When the future property is stratified according to the community and there is a polarized service model,

Before that, we will still see the conflict between property companies and owners.