Be careful to lead you into the urn in the interview.

Be careful to lead you into the urn in the interview.

Beware that the interview will lead you into the urn. I believe everyone is familiar with the interview. There are many holes in the interview. Everyone should also be clear about the problems encountered in the interview, be quick-thinking and face the interviewer's questions calmly. Let's have a look. Beware that the interview will lead you into the urn.

Pay attention to the interview The interview is 1. The two sides are actually playing an intellectual game. In order not to "choose the wrong person", the interviewer may set various traps to test your wisdom, personality, resilience and psychological endurance, but as long as you are sure, the enemy will block you and the water will drown you.

Moral trap

Interviewers sometimes evaluate candidates' business ethics. For example, the interviewer introduces the company's honest and trustworthy corporate culture or simply asks, "As a financial manager, what would you do if the company asked you to evade taxes within 1 year100000 yuan?" If you scratch your head on the spot and want to evade taxes, or list a lot of schemes at once, it means that you have been trapped by them. In fact, in almost all large international enterprises, obeying the law is the most basic requirement of employees' behavior.

Misleading trap

You will jump ship from one company to another. The interviewer asks you, "Is your boss difficult to get along with? Why else did you quit? " Maybe he guessed the reason why you want to quit. Even so, you should remember not to be confused by this sympathetic tone, let alone climb the pole. If you attack your boss angrily, or accuse your company with indignation, then you must be finished, because this not only exposes your intolerance, but also exposes your narrowness. Don't reveal your creativity or design in the interview, and don't gush out what was originally kept secret by the original unit. It is easy to disclose company secrets, and the employer will think about whether this person will disclose his own company secrets in the future; If you spit out all the "goods" in your stomach, wouldn't you become a useless person in the company? What do I need you to do?

Experience trap

Don't get carried away by your rich work experience. If you change jobs too much, the employer will think that you are too ambitious and unreliable. If you have been "struggling" in a job for 10 years, the employer says you are not creative. Experience is not much, but whether it is effective. Take out the hard things that are beneficial to the company and you will be valued by the company.

Beware that the interview will lead you into the urn. In the interview, after the basic greeting, the first question that job seekers are asked is often like this. Many candidates will think, "didn't I write it all on my resume?" Why do you have to ask again? "So, the face is impatient, and some even reply with" I have written all this clearly in my resume ".

But we must pay attention to the absolute respect and sincere answer to every question raised by the interviewer. And this question is a good opportunity for you to "sell yourself". If this question is well answered and impressed, then the next few minutes may be as good as showing the boat. In other words, a brief self-introduction is like a commodity advertisement. In just a few minutes or even seconds, showing your best side without reservation for the needs of "customers" can not only impress each other, but also immediately trigger "purchase desire"

Generally speaking, you should pay attention to the following questions when introducing yourself in an interview:

The content of self-introduction should be consistent with your resume:

Because before the interview, the recruiter already has a detailed resume of the candidate. Therefore, when the applicant introduces himself, the content of self-introduction should be consistent with the resume that has been handed in as far as possible. Otherwise, it will arouse the suspicion of the recruiter.

Try to express colloquially:

When introducing yourself, the language should be as colloquial as possible, and the expression should be as natural as possible, so as not to give people the feeling of reciting lines.

Introduce yourself to the point, don't say irrelevant and useless content;

When introducing yourself, don't talk nonsense, just say whatever you want. But to have substance in words, to the point, to the point. This will leave a good impression on the recruiter.

The speech should be clear and clear, and should conform to the basic logical order:

When introducing yourself, you should be clear-headed, speak in an orderly way, speak in a basic logical order, and don't talk endlessly, without focus or ideas.

Don't cry roast meat, seek truth from facts, so as to give people a very practical feeling. The last thing the company wants is an employee who can only brag and fail in actual operation. Down-to-earth and conscientious employees are the most ideal employees of the company. Therefore, in the interview, candidates must be careful not to flatter themselves and seek truth from facts. Even if they have achieved great success before, they should not be complacent and should act modestly.

In addition, you should pay attention to the following points when introducing yourself in the interview:

1, the first two minutes of self-introduction is the key to the success or failure of the interview, and time control is very important. Prevent self-introduction from boring the examiner for too long.

2. Self-introduction does not mean an introduction to your company or entrepreneurial development. The subject is "I", and the focus is on my work content, experience and achievements in the company. Don't turn it into a "company history" lecture and business introduction.

3. It is best to answer questions directly to the point and answer questions directly. It is best to improve the "purity" of the language. Don't put forward your own opinions or answer questions after a long background introduction or demonstration.

4. Highlight your own advantages. If there is no advantage, at least have a clear preference or interest.

5. Personality outburst or enthusiastic expression should be consistent in the interview, and self-evaluation should be clear and objective, well-founded and supported by examples.

6. Sit up straight and gesture generously to prevent habitual actions such as shaking, shaking and licking your lips.

7. Don't look away from three (or two) examiners for a long time, don't look up at the ceiling, and don't stare at the papers on the examiner's desk.

8. Try to relax your expression, and it is best to smile slightly. You can find your most "friendly" smile in front of the mirror and learn to express friendliness with your eyes or performance.

9. Clothes, hairstyles and even glasses can supplement age. Young people can be a little more mature, and older people try to look younger.

10, cell phones and pagers must be turned off.

In addition, dress neatly and smile during the interview; Dress neatly, don't be unkempt and expressionless. Because the first impression on the examiner is very important, an interviewer with a generous and elegant appearance and a smile can leave a good impression on the examiner.

Be careful to break the language trap in job interview

Some people say that an interview is like a blind date, but it makes sense. In the process of interview, applicants hope to play their advantages to attract the attention of employers in the shortest time, while recruiters hope to find excellent partners and ideal employees in the shortest time. In this process, both applicants and recruiters hope to get to know each other in the shortest time. And this kind of understanding is mainly done through language. In order to find a suitable employee, the recruiter will use this short time to set various language traps in the interview to test the applicant's wisdom, personality, adaptability and psychological endurance.

Of course, for the interviewer, only by seeing through such language traps can we avoid them carefully and skillfully, and finally leave a good impression on the employer. Below, we mainly introduce several language tricks and language traps that employers often use in interviews:

The Language Trap of "Aggressive Style"

"Bullying the soft and fearing the hard" is the most common language trick in the interview field. In the interview, in order to test the psychological endurance of the interviewer, the recruiter often stares at the other party with suspicious, sharp and aggressive eyes before asking questions, shills the psychological defense line of the other party, and then suddenly irritates the other party with an obviously unfriendly question. This is the "provocative law".

"Your experience is too simple. What we need is someone with rich social experience."

"You are too introverted and probably not suitable for our profession."

"We need graduates from brand colleges. You didn't graduate from a brand college. "

"Why doesn't your major match the position you are applying for?"

These are the most common "provocative" questions. When the interviewer is faced with such a question, don't worry and don't get angry. Remember: this is the interviewer's test. If the interviewer is angered at this time, then the interviewer loses, which is the trap of the recruiter.

So, how should the interviewer answer these questions? Might as well answer like this:

Example 1:

"Your experience is too simple. What we need is someone with rich social experience."

"I am sure that if I join your company by chance, I will soon become an experienced person in society. I wish I had this experience. "

Example 2:

"You are too introverted and probably not suitable for our profession."

"It is said that introverts often have the qualities of dedication and persistence, and I am good at listening because I think I should leave more opportunities to speak to others."

Example 3:

"We need graduates from brand colleges. You didn't graduate from a brand college. "

"I heard that Bill Gates didn't graduate from Harvard University."

Example 4:

"Why doesn't your major match the position you are applying for?"

"It is said that the most sought-after talents in the 2 1 century are compound talents, and laymen may be more inspired than experts because they have no fixed thinking and no rules."

In short, when the interviewer is faced with the "provocation" of the recruiter, he should keep calm and consider fighting to resolve the other party's tricks. It should also be noted that the interviewer must keep smiling when answering, so as to achieve static braking.

"Challenging" Language Trap

During the interview, the interviewer often starts with the weakness of the interviewer and tries to "make things difficult" for the interviewer. This interview method is very challenging, which we call the "challenging" language trap. For example:

"Your relevant work experience is relatively lacking. What do you think? "

"Women often lack confidence in their abilities. What do you think? "

"I see your professional performance is not good. What do you think of this problem? "

Faced with these problems, the interviewer should keep a clear head and avoid these sensitive topics wisely. If the interviewer just casually says "not very good", "I don't think so" or "not at all" … then the interviewer has fallen into the language trap of the recruiter. So, what should the interviewer say in this case? We believe that the interviewer can answer this question:

"This statement may not be all right ..."

"This view is worth discussing ..."

"There is some truth in this statement, but I'm afraid I can't fully accept it ..."

"In fact, many problems can't just look at the surface, but ..."

In short, the recruiter wants to see the interviewer's convincing rebuttal, not obedience and acquiescence, when making things difficult for the interviewer. Only when the interviewer can make a positive rebuttal can he "buy" the recruiter's heart.

"Inductive" Language Trap

Some recruiters like to give a scene in the interview in order to examine the interviewer's coping ability, and then induce the interviewer to step into the trap. For example:

"According to your present level, I'm afraid you can find a better company than ours?"

"You are already very good, and we are just a small enterprise. Will you be satisfied? "

"Our salary is not good. Are you satisfied? "

Faced with these problems, if you acquiesce in the interview, it will give people a feeling of "stepping on two boats" and "being in the heart of Cao Cao", thus being at a disadvantage in the interview. So, how should the interviewer resolve this crisis? Not difficult. When the interviewer answers this kind of question, he'd better pretend to be confused and make some vague answers. For example:

"Maybe I can find a better company than your company, but other companies may not attach as much importance to talent training as your company and have as many opportunities as your company; Maybe I can find a better company, and I think it is most important to cherish what I have. "

"Of course, maybe your salary is not ideal, but I know that your company is a very powerful enterprise in the industry. I believe that my choice is more forward-looking in a sense, and the treatment is not all. "

In short, in the face of "induced questions", the interviewer must keep 100% calm, remember not to "take the bait" according to the other party's ideas, and find another way to convince the recruiter.

Language trap of "leading the king into the urn"

"As a financial manager, what would you do if I (the general manager) asked you to evade taxes within 1 year 1 ten thousand yuan?"

When faced with this question, how should the applicant answer? I believe quite a few people will rack their brains and list a lot of tax evasion schemes. As everyone knows, such an answer happens to be in the full set of recruiters. In fact, the interviewer asked this question, the initial purpose is to examine the applicant's business judgment ability and business ethics. Employees who abide by discipline are the employees that recruiters want to find most. If the applicant plays "slick" like this from the beginning, the recruiter will definitely not be satisfied.

The interview of this kind of question is called the language trap of "leading you into the urn" The language trap of "leading a gentleman into an urn" is the most difficult and dangerous.

In short, the interviewer may design various language traps during the interview. As an interviewer, don't worry, be calm, carefully figure out the true intention of the candidate, and then answer carefully, so as to be unstoppable.