Is it okay to put the house key and the property together?

This problem involves two issues: check-in handover and property management. Strictly speaking, the delivery in the sale of houses should be based on the registration of the property right certificate as the final delivery standard. However, in practice, buyers and sellers often take the check-in handover as the main procedure to check whether the house meets the statutory and agreed delivery conditions. Commercial housing sales contracts stipulate and standardize the procedures for housing handover. For example, developers are required to provide housing acceptance certificates to property buyers at the time of housing delivery; If the purchased commercial house is residential, the developer shall also provide a residential quality guarantee and a residential instruction manual. If the developer fails to produce the supporting documents or the supporting documents are incomplete, the purchaser has the right to refuse to hand over the house, and the developer shall bear the responsibility for delaying the delivery. Since the house has been delivered, the relevant property management fees should be paid regardless of whether the owner actually lives, because the property management company provides many property services (such as security and cleaning). ) whether the owner actually lives or not. Experts suggest that consumers should pay attention to several points when handling check-in procedures: take them seriously and be good at exercising their rights. The so-called serious exercise means that when the developer can't provide relevant documents and inform you to go through the check-in formalities, you must resolutely refuse to accept it according to the contract and don't take the house in a muddle. The so-called good exercise is to analyze the problems found to see whether the problems can constitute the reasons for refusing to accept, such as wall surface, ground decoration, sanitary ware does not meet the original standards and so on. Although they are also problems, they generally do not constitute a basis for rejection. For such a problem, it is advisable to go through the check-in formalities first after the developer puts forward the compensation scheme or improvement measures, and then urge the developer to implement it, so as not to delay their use of the house. In the process of handover, the handover procedure should be improved. When handling the handover procedures, if problems are found, they must be recorded in writing. If you decide to refuse to accept, you must explain the reasons for refusing to accept in writing. If there are problems that need to be solved, developers should be asked to write their opinions to prevent future negotiations from failing. In principle, the above written contents should be in duplicate, signed or sealed by both parties, to avoid the successor refusing to recognize the predecessor's promise after the internal personnel changes of the developer.