The fire escape was locked for more than a month, and the car mainly sued the property claim. Who is right?

There is no owner in the residential area who should occupy the fire escape, and the residential property has the right to manage, but many places have their own ways to manage it. Some time ago, an owner of Panlongju Community in Nanning parked his car on the fire escape, and the car was locked by the property the next day. Now, the owner wants to sue the property company. Who is right on both sides?

A two-seater new energy vehicle is parked at a corner of Panlongju Community in Nanning, and this location has been clearly marked as a no-stop area for fire exits. The right rear wheel of the car is locked, and the window is stuck with a note. These notes have two contents. One is the warning of the residential property to the owner for illegal parking, and the other is posted by the owner himself. He said that the car was locked and could not move, and he planned to defend his rights.

Owner of Nanning Panlongju Community? Ms. Zhou: It is wrong to occupy the fire lane, and then he will remind you with a sticker at the beginning of the property management. If you see this note, you should find a parking space.

It turns out that this car has been parked here for more than a month, and many owners can't understand why the owner hasn't moved the car for so long. Mr. Lu, the owner of the car, said that he returned to the community at 4 am on April 29, when it was too dark to notice that it was a fire escape. Who knows that the wheels were locked early the next morning.

Owner? Mr. Lu: I thought it was wrong for me to park in this place, but when I knew it was wrong, I saw that my car was locked and couldn't move. This is the key issue. I don't know who locked my car, so I don't know who I should call to deal with it. Q: But aren't there many notices posted here? ) No, I didn't post it at that time.

So, did the property really not inform the owner when the car was locked?

Nanning Panlongju Residential Property Staff? Mr. Fan: First, there is no information in his car, and the license plate number can't be found, so he can't be contacted. So it was not locked until the next morning. If I lock it, we will send a notice with the company seal.

Property management company: Did you post a notice when you locked the car? The owner refused to write a letter of commitment

Mr. Fan showed a photo with a time watermark, which showed that he had posted a notice on the window when he locked the car on the morning of April 29. It stands to reason that the owner should know to go to the property management after seeing it, but Mr. Lu has never appeared.

It was not until May 6 that Mr. Lu's family found the property and asked to unlock it. At that time, the property staff asked Mr. Lu's family to write a letter of commitment, and Mr. Lu's family did not cooperate, which made it unpleasant.

Nanning Panlongju Residential Property Staff? Mr. Fan: I asked him to write a letter of commitment according to the requirements of the fire brigade. He didn't want to write, so he left and wrote a letter of commitment. It's not complicated, but he doesn't want to write it himself.

Now, Mr. Lu wants to sue the property company and demand compensation for the loss of the vehicle.

Owner? Mr. Lu: I admit the punishment, but the person who locked my car should also pay compensation, because he made my car unusable, and then it broke down. Actually, I don't care about money. I care about tone. Why lock it? Can he lock it?

Lawyer: Does the owner have any reason to file a lawsuit?

Then, does the property have the right to lock the car without authorization, and is the owner's appeal legal? How should this matter be solved?

The lawyer said that the property should take management power to eliminate and eliminate the blockage of fire exits. Although locking the car is a common and simple way, it does not eliminate the obstruction, but makes the obstruction continue, so it is not suitable. Therefore, the owner also has reason to file a lawsuit.

Lawyer of Guangxi Shengtao Law Firm? Chen Yuhang: According to Article 83 of China's current Property Law, I think the property should be towed by the owner's vehicle to a suitable place. As for the cost of this trailer, since the damage is caused by the owner, the cost and cost of the trailer should be borne by the owner.

This article comes from car home, the author of the car manufacturer, and does not represent car home's position.