Should the residential property be held responsible for the theft of the owner's home? What responsibilities do you need to bear?

Whether the property management must bear the responsibility, the important question is whether the property management has fulfilled its obligations and is at fault. For example, the property service contract requires the property personnel to inspect six times a day, but there is no inspection at all when the property personnel check and monitor. The property service contract requires the supervisor to report the fault immediately after the damage, but it has not been repaired for more than half a month. Thieves swaggered in and out of the community, and the property security of the community did not ask for the record. The theft of the owner's house and the theft of vehicles in residential quarters belong to two categories. Whether the property management company must bear the responsibility requires an in-depth analysis of the property service contract signed between the owner and the property management company.

Under normal circumstances, the property service contract will only promise the property management company to repair and transform a part of the house, public facilities, machinery and equipment, green environment and other new projects, and implement safety measures and obligations for the social order of residential quarters. According to the precedent of the relevant people's court, it is difficult for the property management company to bear the responsibility for the theft of the home of the community owner; If the vehicle is stolen, it will fully consider whether the property management has implemented the corresponding security measures and the requirements of the corresponding civil law for security obligations. Property management service personnel shall properly repair, maintain, clean up, afforest and manage some community owners in the property management service area.

Maintain the basic discipline of the property management service area, and adopt scientific and reasonable methods to maintain the personal safety and capital safety of customers. The security obligation of the property management company does not mean that the property management company must ensure the personal safety and assets of customers are not damaged; Does not mean that property management companies have to pay for any personal safety and assets of community owners. Generally speaking, if the property management company installs camera monitoring in the community and has security patrols on time,

And the import and export trade of residential areas. Someone checks the identity of people entering and leaving the residential area. In this case, it should be deemed that the property management company has fulfilled its security obligations. Under this premise, if the owner's home is stolen and his car parked in the community is stolen, the community owner should not ask the property management company for compensation. In order to successfully claim compensation from the property management company, the owners of residential quarters should first cross-examine and prove that the property management company failed to fulfill its due diligence security obligations, and second, there is a logical relationship between the property management company's failure to fulfill its security obligations and the customer's damage.