A positive rider in Changchun evaded nucleic acid detection and sent more than 100 single materials. How to interpret his behavior from a legal perspective?

A positive rider in Changchun evaded nucleic acid detection and sent more than 100 single materials. From a legal point of view, the rider's behavior has been suspected of obstructing the prevention and treatment of infectious diseases. At present, the rider has also taken criminal compulsory measures by the police.

A positive rider in Changchun evaded the nucleic acid test and sent more than 100, which was shocking. Originally, many people were isolated at home because of epidemic prevention and control, and the distribution of local materials was basically guaranteed. It is reasonable to say that there is no shortage of people to send materials. However, the flag bearer of an APP has a different Sao operation. The rider, Guo, not only violated the isolation measures, but also delivered materials while knowing that he was infected, which caused serious communication impact in society. What is even more incomprehensible is that Guo's superiors Dai and Wang also violated the epidemic control regulations. They are also suspected of obstructing the prevention and treatment of infectious diseases like Guo.

A positive rider in Changchun evaded nucleic acid detection and sent more than one single material: 100, which has caused great spread risk to society.

Guo, who lives in Changchun, is a rider, but he is not very honest. When implementing static epidemic prevention and control measures in Changchun, Guo evaded community epidemic control and nucleic acid detection by crossing fences. Guo has delivered more than one order 100 under his own condition, and Wang, Dai and others, the leaders of Guo Company, also managed the riders, which violated the epidemic prevention and control measures. Under the negligence of the leaders of Wang and Dai, Guo had an opportunity to take advantage of it. At the same time, Guo himself was delivering materials, which caused great communication risks to the local area.

From the legal interpretation: it violated the criminal law.

According to the law, Guo personally caused a great spread risk to the society objectively, and subjectively knew that he was infected by evading investigation. Guo clearly constituted the crime of obstructing the prevention and treatment of infectious diseases. In addition, Wang and Dai of Guo Company, as their leaders, also violated the relevant regulations on epidemic prevention and control. They acquiesced in Guo's behavior. Therefore, the latter three people constitute the crime of obstructing the prevention and treatment of infectious diseases, and criminal compulsory measures have also been taken. After Guo recovers, the relevant departments will make a legal judgment on him.