Property intelligent management case analysis topic!

Song's viewpoint is incorrect. First of all, correct a wrong view of Song. Property management fees are not security fees, but order maintenance fees. The order maintainer of the property is only responsible for the order of the public area. The theft of the Song family belongs to the exclusive part and does not belong to the responsibility of the order maintainer of the property. However, if the property service contract signed by the property company and Mr. Song clearly stipulates the protection of private property, the property will compensate all the losses and bear the liability for breach of contract. Paragraph 2 of Article 36 of the Property Management Regulations stipulates: "If a property service enterprise fails to fulfill the stipulations of the property service contract, causing personal and property safety damage to the owner, the property shall bear corresponding legal responsibilities according to law." Then it depends on whether the order maintenance of property service enterprises is in place. No fault, no management defects, no responsibility; Instead, take responsibility.

The property only strengthens the patrol of order maintenance personnel; Entry-exit management registration of past posts; There is also cooperation between the police and the people to strengthen contact with local police stations; Property can also be posted in the public * * * location of the community, prompting to strengthen anti-theft awareness; Increase the publicity of anti-theft knowledge! !

The above personal views are for reference only!