20 19 community workers' exam preparation guidance: reading the "truth" in the story of the speech clip

Tianjin Community Worker Examination Network provides examination skills for all candidates. Why? ",to help candidates enrich their knowledge of preparing for exams and analyze their answering skills. More exciting content in the recruitment of community workers!

Myth 1: Contrastive type

Example 1 Is the famous French fable writer fashionable? There is such a fable in Dan's works: who is more powerful, the north wind or the south wind, depends on who can blow off the coat on pedestrians. The north wind is blowing, trying to let the cold wind blow away people's clothes. Therefore, pedestrians wrap their coats more tightly to resist the cold. The south wind is blowing slowly and it's warm. Pedestrians feel warm, so they unbutton their buttons and take off their coats. Nanfeng won.

This fable aims to tell people ()

A. if the method is right, it will be both hard and soft.

B. practice is the only criterion for testing truth.

C. Specific analysis of specific problems

D. if a worker wants to do a good job, he must sharpen his tools first.

The answer is A. Analysis: The problem is that this fable is to tell people, and the fable is to reflect the truth, which is actually what the fable conveys to us. There is a contrast between the north wind and the south wind in the material. The north wind and the south wind adopt different strategies. What is the north wind? Whoo-hoo. What's the result? The traveler wrapped his coat tightly? ; What about the south wind? Blow slowly? , do you understand? Pedestrians undress? Victory. In the end, Nanfeng won, so we should learn from those who have achieved their goals. They combine rigidity with softness, and we should learn from the south wind of victory, that is, softness can overcome rigidity. So the answer is a.

This topic, the material is presented in the form of contrast, and two things are compared, so it is necessary for us to learn to reflect the truth. We can see who has achieved the goal and learn from whom.

Myth 2: Causality.

The monkey heard that Boss Niu wanted a tutor, so he applied for it. He found the cow boss who was farming in the paddy field, and the two sides agreed on related matters. The next day, the monkey is going to teach. When he left, he hunched into the pond and painted himself with dirty mud. The mother monkey was surprised and asked him why. The monkey said, I met the boss of the cow yesterday. It was probably their family. When in Rome, do as the Romans do and get closer. ? Boss Niu saw the monkey's dirty appearance and was full of unhappiness, yelling for him to leave. The monkey asked in surprise. Isn't that what you did yesterday? Boss Niu replied contemptuously as he closed the door. I work in a rice field! ? .

The enlightenment of this fable to grass-roots civil servants is:

A. hard work is the most welcome thing for the masses.

B. In-depth investigation can better serve the masses.

C. Closer mass relations cannot solve the problem better.

D. understanding people's demands can solve people's sufferings.

The answer is B. Analysis: The dry topic method is the inspiration of this fable to grassroots civil servants, and the material is to convey a truth to grassroots personnel through a story. When the monkey heard that Boss Niu wanted a tutor, he applied for it and discussed it with Boss Niu in the paddy field. Before class the next day, he smeared himself with mud, because he thought everyone was probably interested in it, wanted to do as the Romans do, and was finally kicked out. The reason for the failure was that it wanted to get closer, but it didn't investigate or ask the boss if Niu's family was like this. It just guessed it by itself and never got it right. Therefore, we should tell grass-roots civil servants that when they want to serve Niu Lao Wei and represent the masses, they should not guess the masses, but visit and investigate on the spot. B correct. The monkey also worked hard, but failed. A focuses on a prejudice, while C denies that it is necessary to narrow the distance between people. Monkeys, yes. D focuses on understanding people's demands, which is also an easily confused option. Monkeys understand Niu boss's demands and ask the teacher for advice is the demand, but the root cause of failure is that there is no field investigation and subjective imagination out of thin air. Candidates who choose D are looking for the root cause of the mistake. So the answer is B.

This problem is a causal story, and the final result is failure. To reflect the truth, we must find out the cause of the result and extract the truth from it. The above analysis process is the process of causal short story analysis. Have you learned?

Myth 3: Story Collection Story Types

There is such a story in Zhuangzi. Zhuangzi asked the supervisor to borrow food, and the supervisor said? Ok, I'll collect the rent immediately, and I can lend you 300 gold then. ? Zhuangzi told Hou Jian a fable: When I came yesterday, I heard a cry for help on the road. I looked back and found a crucian carp in the rut. I asked it, what are you shouting? The crucian carp replied, I am an aquarium in the East China Sea. Do you? The water of battle? , save my life? I said, ok, I'm going to the south to lobby King Wu Yue to lead him? The water of Xijiang River? It's a relief for you. The poor fish said, in that case, you might as well come to me at the dried fish shop.

The following options are most relevant to the moral of the story told by Zhuangzi:

A. verbal commitment is not enough.

B.it is better to teach people to fish than to teach them to fish.

C. good steel is used on the blade.

D. far from hydrolysis, near thirst

The answer is A. Analysis: In the dried fish story told by Zhuangzi, the crucian carp dying of thirst turned to Zhuangzi for help? The water of battle? Zhuangzi promised to give it? The water of Xijiang River? Seemingly generous, in fact, crucian carp has not been effectively helped; Similarly, Zhuangzi borrowed food from the supervisor, and he agreed? Three hundred gold? Seemingly generous, in fact, Zhuangzi didn't get much-needed food. The story told in Zhuangzi's fable is ironic to those who pay lip service but don't provide substantial help. ? Pay lip service but not pay lip service? It means that you only promise to give benefits to others verbally, and the actual benefits can't reach others, which is in line with the fable. Candidates can easily choose the wrong D, far from being thirsty. It means that slow methods can't save the urgent. There is a clear contrast in the question. It's not a big deal to borrow food, but I agreed. Three hundred gold? ,? The water of battle? Not much, but agreed? The water of Xijiang River? Instead of focusing on the slow way, it is a good word that cannot be done in practice. So the answer is a.

In this question, there are two short stories in the stem, and the story is a story. Although the main question is what is the moral of the story told by Zhuangzi, the big story can also help us to understand that the two stories are essentially the same, convey the same truth and need to be analyzed, which can help us better understand the moral of the article.