Henan 1.53 million women bought an auction house, but were "rejected" by the property. Does the property have the right to do this?

The property certainly has no right to do so. After all, the property is just a management company invited by the community owners, and there is no right to directly prevent the owners from entering their homes. A woman in Henan bought an auction house for 6.5438+0.53 million yuan, but was blocked by the property, not only placing a lot of abandoned trees in front of his house. Moreover, when he checked in, he also obstructed it in every way, and even directly posted the words "there is a dispute in the room" on his glass. Such behavior of property not only fails to perform its duties, but also is illegal.

First, the ins and outs of this matter.

When the reporter called the property manager to inquire about the situation, he said that although the house had legitimate rights and interests, the garden could not be given to the woman. Because the former owner of the house had an economic dispute with the developer, there was no garden in the contract. Therefore, the current owners can't directly use the garden, which leads the property to take such actions at the behest of the developer and prevent the owners from entering the door.

Second, the property has no right to do so.

The property only allows the owners of the community to manage the community while maintaining normal operations. As a professional management team, they should be responsible to the owners first, not to the developers. After all, the owners pay the property management fee, not their salary. However, it is obvious that the residential property does not define its own position, and at the same time, it gives up branches at the door of others to prevent others from entering the door, which in itself violates the legitimate rights and interests of the owners and is illegal.

Third, how should this matter be handled?

Since there is a dispute, then the three parties should stand up and negotiate to solve the problem. The former owner's house has been auctioned, which has nothing to do with him. Since the developer said that there was an economic dispute over the house, the developer, the property manager and the current owner should negotiate where they face the dispute. However, judging from the auction contract of the court, it was determined that the garden and terrace of the house were part of the house at that time. In other words, the current owner has the actual right to use the whole house and garden.