Job Recruitment Website - Property management - Should the property bear the responsibility if the vehicle glass is smashed?

Should the property bear the responsibility if the vehicle glass is smashed?

If the vehicle glass is smashed, the property responsibility can only be investigated according to the situation: the vehicle glass was smashed because it entered the foreign personnel from the community, endangering the safety of the announcement area. The victim of the vehicle glass smashed filed a lawsuit with the people's court where the community is located according to the local community property management regulations or the existing community property management contract: "* * * has regional order maintenance", as well as direct evidence such as monitoring materials and security guards' oral recordings (here it needs to be emphasized).

But what I want to tell you is that in reality, if there is no strong and direct evidence to prove that the property company is at fault (for example, the entrance and exit monitoring shows that outsiders go in and out at will, and the security guard sleeps), this kind of lawsuit is difficult to win (the court generally favors the property company).

However, if there is no evidence after the vehicle glass is smashed, it is easier to pursue the responsibility not from the property management company, but from the owners (excluding the owners on the first and second floors) who may cause the shelves and hanging objects of high-rise buildings to fall off. According to Article 85 of the Tort Liability Law: "If buildings, structures or other facilities and their shelving and hanging objects fall off and cause damage to others, and the owner, manager or user cannot prove that he is not at fault, he shall bear tort liability. After compensation, the owner, manager or user, if there are other responsible persons, has the right to recover from them. "

According to this regulation, it is the way that the owner of the high-rise building may cause the vehicle glass to be smashed, that is, the owner of the high-rise building must prove that he has no evidence that may cause the vehicle glass to be smashed before he can be exempted. Otherwise, all senior owners will share the full cost of repairing the broken vehicle glass.