Property supply

It's not that good intentions are not rewarded, it's just that I recited them here. All claims for compensation are supported by law, and it is not groundless for anyone to claim compensation. In fact, it is clearly stated in the Civil Code that if an abandoned animal suddenly hurts others, the original keeper or manager of the animal shall bear the responsibility.

During this incident, Fang was bitten by a stray dog that suddenly rushed out because of normal walking. Theoretically, he should go to the original owner of this stray dog and ask him to make compensation. If the dog has no owner, the property is liable for compensation. (The property is not well managed) But it's not a day or two since the dog stayed here. It's just that in this community, Xu will bring some food to the stray dog when he feeds his pet, and even take the stray dog for a walk. According to the requirements of the Civil Code, Xu Mo thinks that the manager of this stray dog.

If Xu didn't feed the stray dog regularly, maybe the stray dog wouldn't wander around the community for a long time, and maybe it wouldn't bite Fang, but in fact this causal relationship is not imposed. It is no problem to find Xu's compensation according to law.

The content of netizens' debate is that it is good to feed stray dogs. Why should we punish them? This matter is more about seeing both sides. On the one hand, if Xu didn't feed stray dogs, there might not be any injuries. On the other hand, the most lively argument among netizens is that even if Xu doesn't feed him, the dog will go somewhere else to bite people. However, according to the civil law, if you bite people in other places, you will also find the original owner to bear the responsibility. If you can't find the original owner, it will still be the property responsibility. In any case, it's no problem to act according to law, but if you still find stray dogs, it's better to call the Animal Protection Association.