An owner in Nanning was injured by the lifting railing at the entrance of the community and was asked to compensate for the loss. Is this reasonable?

It is reasonable that an owner in Nanning was injured by the lifting railing at the entrance of the community and was asked to compensate for the loss. There are electric vehicle lanes and motor vehicle lanes in the community. According to the traffic rules, electric vehicles are not allowed to enter motor vehicle lanes. The railing of the community was smashed and the man was injured in the head. This matter is caused by men and must be borne by men. The lifting railing is specially designed for automobile traffic, and there is a special passage for electric vehicles next to it. The owner of the community couldn't wait for the other two trams to pass, so he directly got under the lifting pole, resulting in head injury and damage to the lifting pole. So it is reasonable for the security guard to demand compensation for 600 yuan. After all, it costs money to repair the lifting railing, and this part of the cost will be borne by the owner.

1. Before lifting the railing, it has been clearly marked that electric vehicles are not allowed to pass. Men can't wait. They made it.

The man returned to the community from the outside and saw two electric cars running in the electric car channel. He was anxious to go home, so he crossed the lifting railing. When passing by, the lifting railing just fell, and the man couldn't react for a moment, and his head was hit by the railing. The railing just fell to the rear of the car and was severely stuck by the vehicle. When the security guard came out, he asked the man to compensate 600 yuan for the cost of repairing the railing.

Second, the man did not obey the traffic rules, causing damage to the lifting rod. He should compensate 600 yuan or have the railing repaired.

When the man came home, he found a big bag on his forehead. The more he thinks about it, the more wrong he is. He hurt his head by the railing, and he has to pay for repairing the railing. Isn't this a double crime? So the man found the security guard again, hoping to get the 600 yuan back. The two sides also had a dispute over the maintenance of the railing. Legally speaking, the man first failed to obey the traffic rules and passed through the motorway without authorization, causing public property losses, which required him to bear personal responsibility. ?

So, who do you think is responsible for the man's head injury caused by the lifting rod?