How to deal with the safety violation of residential star shed

You can discuss it with the owner first and see if it can be dismantled. If the owner does not agree, he can apply for property intervention. If you can't solve it, you can ask the police or the court for help.

For the rights of specific owners, such as walking, ventilation, lighting, safety, etc. If they are really infringed, they can sue in court and ask other owners to dismantle illegal buildings.

Extended data:

Can the property company ask the owner to dismantle the illegal building, and will the court support it?

In judicial practice, property companies have also filed civil litigation disputes because the owners violated the owners' temporary convention or decoration management agreement, and some courts have also filed cases and treated them as owners' breach of contract.

However, the temporary owners' convention is a commitment made by the owners to other owners in the same community, and their rights and obligations are borne by the owners. Even if an individual owner violates this promise, other owners (too many, through the owners' committee) should file a civil lawsuit instead of the property management company.

Although the nature of the decoration management agreement is ostensibly an agreement signed between the owner and the property management company, the essence is still that the owner takes this opportunity to promise the prohibitions and precautions in the decoration that most owners have reached an agreement, and the other party to the promise is still other owners rather than the property management company. The property company has no legal right to file a civil lawsuit as the counterpart of the contract.

Legally speaking, the main reason why the property company has no right to sue is that the responsibility of the property company itself is based on the property service agreement and the authorization of the owners' Committee, and its management right to the property owners to dispose of their own property is limited, and it is not the subject of relevant rights and obligations, nor the source of rights.