Should the property be compensated as long as it falls in the community?

Judge: According to Article 37 of the Tort Liability Law of People's Republic of China (PRC), managers of hotels, shopping malls, banks, stations, entertainment places and other public places or organizers of mass activities who fail to fulfill their security obligations and cause damage to others shall bear tort liability. Security obligation is a legal obligation at the level of tort liability law. The principle of fault liability should be applied to those who violate the obligation of safety guarantee and cause damage to others, that is, the property company should compensate only if it is at fault.

The property company failed to take drying measures in time and set warning signs on the ground after mopping the floor, which was at fault for the plaintiff's fall, so it assumed a certain proportion of compensation liability. Moreover, if the victim is also at fault for the occurrence of the damage, he should also bear the corresponding responsibility. In life, there are many reasons for falling. If the property company is not at fault in this process, it cannot be asked to take responsibility.

What evidence should be prepared for safeguarding rights?

Judge: The victim should bear the burden of proof for the course of the accident, the fault of the other party and his own loss. Therefore, it is suggested that the victim take photos and videos of the scene in time, monitor the community in time, or find relevant witnesses, and keep treatment documents, medical records and all evidence that can prove his loss. If the injury is serious, you can also entrust an appraisal institution to conduct disability appraisal to further determine your own losses.