Suizhou Binhu Bay encountered overlord clause in buying a house.

By the way, I have three main comments on this contract:

1. When the actual area is inconsistent with the contract area, there are two options. Developers choose to retreat more and make up less. And I choose: if the price difference is within 3%, the buyer has the right to return the house. If the buyer does not choose to return the house, the developer will bear more than 3% of the actual area. When the actual area is small, the developer will double the part exceeding 3%.

The sales girl disagrees, which is obviously exempting the developer, depriving the buyers of their rights and damaging their rights.

2. The contract only talks about the building area, not about the interior area and the pool area, nor about the percentage of the pool area. The developer has crossed out all these blanks, and I want to fill them out clearly.

The sales girl disagreed, which made it impossible to accurately measure the usable area in the future, and it was impossible to judge whether the actual situation was consistent with the contract, which was controversial and unfounded.

3. The developer mentioned in the publicity that the supporting facilities include nanny apartments, aerial canteens and kindergartens, and guaranteed that every household can have an above/below ground parking space. I demand that these be written into the contract or supplementary terms. If these supporting facilities cannot be fulfilled, we must compensate us for the corresponding losses.

The developer does not agree, which leads to the non-fulfillment of the supporting facilities in the future. We will complain when there is no discount.

The above three points are very legitimate and reasonable requirements for property buyers, but the sales girl resolutely disagreed with my change requirements and repeatedly said that the deposit would not be refunded if she did not sign, and the house would be sold separately! Where is justice?