Nanny case attribute

After the nanny arson, it is obvious that this nanny, this baiwenhang killer, must be severely punished. I hope she can exchange her life for her life.

Another focus is whether the property company owned by the community should bear the responsibility.

The fire problem in this community is really big.

1, the implementation of fire safety management is not in place.

First of all, you didn't fill in the fire equipment inspection form, which shows that you are too lazy to do superficial articles.

Friends who pay a little attention will find that there should be a card in the fire fighting equipment, no matter in the company or in public places, with the date, the signature of the personnel and the words similar to normal.

In arson, the watch was there, but it was blank. So no one checked?

Secondly, look it up without doing any form work?

Fires are more accidents. If a series of preventive measures can be taken before these accidents happen, at least the disaster will be much lighter.

Everyone is shouting the slogan of "prevention first, combining prevention with elimination" and "everyone is responsible for fire safety". If you don't put it into action, everything is written.

2. Many fire hydrant box doors are wrapped in marble decoration, which is inconvenient to open.

The switch of fire hydrant pump in mine room is closed and needs to be turned on manually. In general, if there is a fire, the water pump switch will automatically turn on.

In other words, these security risks exist every day. Owners face risks every day, but they don't know they are in danger. However, the property has always been lucky, and the probability of fire is very small, especially in cities like Hangzhou.

3. The fire lane was covered with green, which delayed the rescue time.

In the process of rescue, this is a big taboo. The cars have arrived, there is no place to stop, and they can't stop as expected, which hinders the rescue operation.

So how big is the responsibility of the property, I believe everyone is already measuring it in their hearts. It was their series of negligence that led to the failure of fire management, and four people paid the price of their lives.

It seems that this is not true. The killer is a nanny, the disaster is a fire, but if everything is all right, at least someone is still alive.

Poor Mr Lin lost his wife and three children. Every day is like a year, Lacrimosa.

There are too many "dirty" properties now, so we must not treat property companies lightly. It's not that we are cruel, and we don't want to be the next one!