Should the property be responsible for the dry lake in the community?

First of all, under normal circumstances, the property company wins the lawsuit of refusing to pay the property management fee. You are not advised to refuse to pay.

Secondly, let's analyze the problem. What is the geographical location of this lake? Is it within the scope of residential land (within the red line of the parcel)? Are there any marks on the drawings filed by the planning department? If it is marked, and it is within the scope of the residential land, it should belong to public facilities, and the property company, as the responsible unit for managing the public facilities and equipment in the residential area, has the obligation and responsibility to manage the lake, not because it was built by the developer, because according to this logical reasoning, the houses, pumps and elevators in the residential area are all owned by the developer, so can the property company not manage, maintain and maintain it? Obviously not.

So how to solve it? In fact, the property management company can include the related expenses of managing and maintaining the lake into the management cost, and then the property management company can calculate the amount that each owner should share according to the construction area recorded in the real estate license because of the increase of this part of the cost, and ask the industry Committee to vote on this part of the cost. If more than two-thirds of the owners agree, then the property can be charged. If it is less than two-thirds, then, because the property management company is an enterprise, it is impossible to pay the fees instead of the owners, and the result is that the lake is unattended and dried up.

After all, under the condition of market economy, service is paid. Of course, if the property management fee already includes the cost of maintaining the lake, there is no need to pay it separately.