How do developers and property management companies cooperate?

In the handover of property management, the administrative department of the government should do a good job in supervision and acceptance, and do a good job in supervision and management of the handover of materials and articles, so as to ensure that leaving the company will leave no sequelae and the new company will settle in smoothly. At this time, the administrative department of the government should treat children equally, adhere to the principle of "whoever holds the child will take care of it", deal with the facts, resolutely stop and punish violations, and put an end to the phenomenon of mutual shirking. Only in the case of openness and transparency can we distinguish between responsibilities and rights, straighten out various relationships, and prevent the occurrence of contradictions and the embarrassing situation of mutual wrangling in the future. In addition, we should also establish a long-term mechanism for government administrative departments to guide and supervise and increase penalties. Government departments should be "gatekeepers". The park reconstruction can't find the completion map of the pipe network, and the building quality leads to the leakage of rain from the house. All kinds of problems left by developers not only affect the normal operation of the community, but also transfer the responsibility to the property company, resulting in some residents refusing to pay property fees and other adverse "chain reactions", which affect the normal life of the community owners. To solve the problems left by developers, government management departments should not stand idly by. They should be "middlemen" and "gatekeepers". They should not only do a good job in communication between developers and property companies, but also refine policy operations, follow up violations, improve measures and remedies, and promote the smooth transition from development to property management through restrictive means such as development qualification certification, development project approval, and establishment of exit mechanism. Cure the sequelae left by developers, and let property companies lay down their burdens and serve easily. "Separation of construction and management" reduces the remaining problems. The reason why the problems left over have become the focus of disputes between the property and the owner is that the owner did not directly supervise the handover between the developer and the property, resulting in the owner simply not knowing the commitment and working standards between the developer and the property, so the property has various reasons. Therefore, it is urgent to establish an owner supervision system for the handover of developers and properties. There is a representative of the owner present at the handover, and no one can shirk the responsibility, which is open and transparent. In this way, rights and responsibilities are clear, and disputes will naturally be much less. I think the project handover left by the developer should involve the owner. Because the property owner of the community is the owner, not the developer or the property company. The employment of property management companies in many cities is not standardized, and many development units designate subordinate enterprises to undertake property management. Developers and property companies are father-son relationships, and it is difficult to guarantee that property companies will not excuse developers in the future. The second is to clarify the time limit for improvement. Now that the owners have moved in, the improvement of the community can not be delayed indefinitely, which will affect the quality of use of the owners. The third is to sign a perfect contract and clarify the liquidated damages. In a limited time, developers or property companies can not fulfill the agreement, it is necessary to compensate the owners.