Chongqing Shi Tian subordinate property.

Is it illegal for Chongqing Property to lend idle houses for 10 years to others?

1. Why did Chongqing Property lend the 10 idle house to others? Property companies have always been representatives of inaction in everyone's mind, because many property companies have many contradictions in their usual relationship with owners, but one property company not only does nothing, but also lends the owner's idle house to others. The reason why the property lends the owner's idle house to others is because the owner's neighbor's house has some problems that need to be repaired. The property saw the owner's house idle. So I gave the key to this neighbor and asked her to stay for a while. Here, after the neighbors lived in the past, they not only used the owner's house as a storage room, but also made the house messy, and the owner didn't know it. Obviously, the practice of the property infringes on the legitimate rights and interests of the owner.

Second, does the behavior of the property constitute illegal occupation? Without the consent of the owner, the property lends the owner's idle house to others for living, which damages the legitimate rights and interests of the owner. Because this house is the owner's private property, the property has no right to decide the use of this house. Although the owner has not lived for many years and the house has been idle, the property can't give the key to the neighbor privately and let her live in it. But also in the owner's room randomly stacked debris. Obviously, the behavior of the property has constituted illegal possession. If the master pursues it.

Third, how to treat the practice of property? The practice of property has puzzled many people. We ordinary people know that other people's things can't be moved, even children know it, but the property has lent the owner's house to other owners aboveboard, and the owner didn't even know it for such a long time. If I hadn't gone to his house this time, I believe the owner had been kept in the dark, and the property even claimed that I didn't know that the house belonged to the owner, indicating that the property didn't feel guilty about its behavior. Although the two sides are now negotiating compensation, many people are angry at the behavior of the property, because the current property company has gone too far and added many problems to the growing contradiction between the owners and the property. I hope the relevant departments can rectify the behavior of the property, standardize the behavior of the property company, so that the legitimate rights and interests of our owners will no longer be infringed.