The story of property cleaning

Nearly 100 researchers from Hefei Research Institute of Chinese Academy of Sciences gave up their career establishment, moved out of the talent welfare room and resigned collectively. These people all come from the same branch. And all this is because the security in the office has changed. Do you think this is normal? People with a little common sense will feel that something is wrong, but the relevant person in charge of Hefei Research Institute replied "it is normal, it is a normal resignation problem". This is simply a lie, completely ignoring the IQ of the public and insulting the majority of netizens!

So, what are the reasons for the collective resignation of high-end talents? What makes these high-tech talents choose to leave so resolutely and cleanly?

Event Review Hefei Institute of Material Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences is located on a beautiful peninsula, where the working environment kills ordinary office buildings, and some scholars even named it "Science Island".

More than 90 researchers who left this time are all from the Institute of Nuclear Safety Technology.

Seeing this news, the author was surprised that there were only 200 people in the research institute, and nearly 100 people left their jobs collectively.

This kind of collective resignation has nothing to hide. The fuse was that the hospital forced the nuclear research institute to change security guards.

However, before changing the security guard, the hospital didn't greet the researchers in advance because of negligence. Some people think that their rights and interests have been violated, lack the minimum respect for researchers, and then choose to leave.

This explanation is acceptable if some people leave their jobs. After all, some intellectuals are aloof and their human rights and freedoms are restricted to a certain extent, so it is understandable to choose to leave.

However, it is ridiculous to say that nearly half of the employees have left their jobs collectively and given up their career establishment because of the change of security during the difficult stage of job hunting.

Ma Yun once said that if employees leave, there are only two reasons. First, the money was not given in place; second, I was wronged.

This sentence is popular in China, not because it is as simple as Ma Yun said, but because it is really incisive, pointing out two reasons why employees leave their jobs.

Then we might as well make a real cause analysis and guess from these two aspects.

The reason why many people choose to leave their jobs is simple, that is, less money. After all, everyone has to live. If income can't guarantee the quality of life, getting a higher salary through job hopping is the fastest shortcut to improve the quality of life.

Then let's take a look at the overall treatment of the employees who left the institute.

It is understood that many employees of Hoso are high-end talents, which is easy to understand. Without high education, they can't enter the research center of Chinese Academy of Sciences.

Many of the people who resigned were masters of the Chinese University of Science and Technology, with an average age of 365,438+0, which can be said to be the backbone of advanced research.

Most of these people are making up, and the welfare benefits are self-evident. The monthly salary is more than 0/000/kloc, which is already a high salary in Hefei!

And unlike ordinary institutions, many people have welfare houses in the science house, which is beyond others' reach.

A researcher at the institute said in an interview:

Through this sentence, it is fully proved that the treatment of the nuclear institute is still very generous, and it has not reached the point of resigning to make a living.

Then, there is only one reason to resign: be wronged!

The author looked up the news reports about the incident and found that one unofficial news was particularly eye-catching and credible.

According to sources, the institute had a new leader last year. After the leadership came, drastic institutional reforms were carried out within the institute.

But when it comes to reform, it will inevitably affect the adjustment and redistribution of interests, and some people will inevitably not adapt.

Sure enough, in the process of this reform, the clique brought by the new leader from the original unit was entrusted with a heavy responsibility and successively served as the leaders of various departments, and the original employees were excluded.

In addition, in June this year, there was a discussion on how to evaluate the reform measures of Hefei Institute of Material Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences.

The main content of this discussion is the reform means after the new leader takes office, and it is unknown which direction the reform of Hefei Research Institute will point to.

However, if you are suspected of nepotism and nepotism in the reform process, it will hurt the hearts of old employees and become the real reason for their resignation.

And such a leader simply does not deserve to be the leader of a national key scientific research unit!

Conclusion The author believes that this is by no means a collective resignation event of high-end talents that can be created by changing a security company and improving company security.

There must be a hidden secret behind this. What made the "Science Island" become "Shutter Island" and made nearly 100 researchers leave in a hurry? Relevant units need to get to the root of the problem.

Strangely, there are no secrets!

After reading the relevant news from the Internet, the unit's external rhetoric seems to be that the security guard changed the access card for the internal staff, which caused a lot of inconvenience to the staff and led to the collective resignation of more than 90 researchers. This statement is really ridiculous.

Hefei, a national scientific research institute, seems to be a research institution in nuclear physics, and its importance is self-evident. In a scientific research unit like this, professional researchers are absolutely indispensable wealth for this research institute. They need to do scientific research, produce research results and win the honor of the unit. Security work (this incident only involves the doorman) is to maintain the daily safety of the unit, and the security work of the unit is likely to be done by an outsourced third party, so it is impossible not to know which is more important. If it is really because of the inconvenience caused by the new credit card scheme to researchers, I believe that the leaders will never ignore these business elites, so that more than 90 researchers have resigned collectively. The only explanation is that some decisions of the unit have harmed the interests of researchers, made them unable to work with peace of mind, made them angry and resigned collectively.

Unofficial news, the unit has a new leader, carried out internal institutional reform, and the heads of some departments have been replaced by their own people brought by the new leader from the original unit.

If so, what the new leaders did not only hurt the enthusiasm of researchers, but also damaged the development of scientific research in China. Such cronyism and cronyism are not worthy of being the leader of a unit at all, let alone a scientific research institution!

This matter evolved from "one emperor and one courtier". A security guard changed access control and more than 90 people resigned? Are you kidding? If there is no greater interest behind it, how can you leave with high welfare, high treatment and high provident fund!

According to informed sources, it is the new leadership of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, and the new officials will inevitably undergo drastic reforms.

As a result, as soon as the leaders came up, they happily made rectification! This rectification has gone too far. First, it has a rhythm and changed a group of its own people. Second, it is unfair to the original personnel arrangement of scientific researchers and has a negative effect.

Both sides hold their own words, and the dead side will know at a glance! The institute said: nuclear research is a state secret, so the regular army transferred to the security team is more at ease.

The news of anonymous users is not necessarily true, but may be a guess for ordinary users and may not be acceptable. However, it is doubtful that "drastic reform" and the collective resignation of scientific researchers have occurred one after another.

According to the reporter's investigation, it is reported that someone used this introduction to dig a corner of socialism. The fuse of the collective resignation was that the hospital forced the nuclear hospital to change security guards, and the researchers of the nuclear hospital thought their rights and interests were violated.

In response, Hefei Institute of Material Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences responded: "More than 90 researchers resigned", and resignation is a "normal flow of personnel".

The staff said that "this kind of personnel flow has always existed, and the resignees also have their own arrangements and destinations."

The staff said that resignation is a personal choice of some employees. "Basically, I went to work in relevant technology achievement investment companies and went through normal resignation procedures."

The above news reveals a question, which comes first, the chicken or the egg?

Did someone pull up a scientific research company outside to change security to prevent the loss of state secrets?

Or did you really resign collectively because you were dissatisfied with the replacement of security guards, as mentioned in the title?

I think the former is more likely. It is precisely because a large number of researchers have left their jobs, or someone has revealed this, so I am afraid the new security and access control are unknown.

It is known that the research project of this institute is built on a peninsula, also called "Science Island".

"Artificial Little Sun" was successfully developed here. The institute has won many national scientific research awards such as "National Science and Technology Progress Award".

The nuclear fusion reactor is also called "artificial little sun".

In the high temperature and high pressure environment of the sun, deuterium atoms and tritium atoms collide constantly to carry out fusion reaction, thus generating huge heat that illuminates the whole solar system.

And if there were more such scientific research projects, wouldn't the number of people in this scientific research institution drop sharply from 500 to more than 100?

Therefore, I would like to ask, is this brain drain really a normal brain drain as the research says?

Obviously, there is no project, and researchers can't get the salary of the project.

In the end, such an excellent scientific research group also suddenly experienced a serious brain drain problem, which shows that the treatment of scientific research personnel is unfair, and the pace of internal rectification of the institute is too eager to achieve success, without taking into account the emotions of employees, so many experienced and talented scientific research personnel collectively quit or quit their jobs.

If there are high salaries and scientific research projects in the system, I believe such a group of people will not want to leave the system.

More than 90 people from Hefei Institute of Material Science of Chinese Academy of Sciences left their jobs collectively, most of whom were highly educated undergraduates and doctoral students. They have jobs, doctors with a monthly income of more than 10 thousand, and enjoy welfare housing distribution. What caused these highly educated talents to resign collectively? Online said they were changing security guards. This is obviously a slap in the face, as follows.

The reason for leaving is to change security, just an excuse. It is normal that our unit has changed security guards and the property has changed security guards. Why didn't anyone resign collectively? There is nothing wrong with the normal flow of talents. Dozens of researchers in a research institute suddenly resigned, and the news said that the reason was to change security. This reason is too far-fetched

This is obviously a management loophole, which led to this problem. Communicate well with researchers, change safety issues, and how to strengthen safety management and confidentiality management. It is more helpful to listen to their opinions.

Rome was not built in a day. When it becomes safe, researchers are scared, indicating that researchers have not paid enough attention to it. They are talents, not machines, and should be given the minimum respect.

Response from the Ministry of Personnel: A person in charge of the Information Department of the Institute said that more than 90 researchers collectively submitted their resignations to the Institute in June. "They all resigned voluntarily, and the resignation procedures have been completed." The staff also revealed that some people were poached, but leaving is a normal flow of people.

I checked the average salary in Hefei. The average salary in 20 18 years is 6963 yuan, and the monthly salary of doctors is more than 10 thousand. Although it is higher than the average level, let's take a look at the average social wage in first-tier cities: 20 10646 yuan/month in Shenzhen and 9580 yuan/month in Shanghai. In contrast, wages are not attractive.

If you don't want money, even if you win glory for your country, you should try to be happy. Management can't keep up, and employees can't stay.

As doctors, highly educated talents are still scarce. Colleges and enterprises outside the besieged city are eyeing these people, especially those who have scientific research achievements and are excellent. The right to negotiate wages is in the hands of these talents. In the face of huge internal and external differences, it is understandable to leave collectively.

China is in the process of economic transformation and high-quality economic development, and it is impossible for a large number of scientific researchers to leave their jobs. More investment is needed to achieve great development. It is an important task to retain scientific and technological talents.

Why can't people keep the career that many people desperately want, and why can't they keep the hearts of these highly educated talents? The brain drain of outstanding talents mostly has the following problems.

There is something wrong with the management mechanism.

The development goal is vague, excellent people hope to grow together with the unit, and hope that the unit has lofty goals and can find common achievements.

The management system is harsh and daunting. There is no room for development in order to cope with the system.

There is a problem with employee motivation.

Well done, not well done. Employees who did not do well were not punished and remained lazy. Why do excellent employees have the motivation to work?

The unit is too mercenary, and the transformation advocates "frugality". You need to bring your own toilet paper, and customers have to pay for their own gifts.

Employees don't feel the respect they deserve

Repressive management of employees should be done well, not praised, but generally accused of doing it, which makes people feel that the management method is cold.

The unit doesn't respect talents, and thinks that they will work for me if they are paid, instead of encouraging everyone to "work with me" and enjoy the happiness of independence and creation.

There is no prospect for unit development.

Without core projects or uncompetitive products, employees know that it is difficult to achieve results no matter how hard they work, so they can only leave in principle.

Decision-making ability of managers

I feel weak and indecisive, my superiors don't send classes, and my subordinates are like headless flies. If something goes wrong, let the subordinates take the blame and clean it up by themselves.

Personal choice of employees

Personal development prospects do not match the company platform. Excellent people will be very clear about their career planning and development prospects. When the company can't give excellent employees a clear career promotion channel, it can only be done step by step, and brain drain is also essential.

Conclusion: Scientific research institutions are the heavy weapon of the country, and talents are the key to major scientific research progress and achievements. Only by putting people first and keeping up with the management and investment according to the characteristics of talents can researchers concentrate on their own work and make outstanding achievements in scientific research.

Just because you have security problems, you must make it clear on the table whether to leave or leave collectively. However, it is not difficult to share the reasons for leaving. That institute is engaged in nuclear research, and most of the institutes of Chinese Academy of Sciences focus on basic research. The income is definitely higher than the social average, but considering that researchers are masters of well-known universities at home and abroad, the entertainment requirements for them will be higher. According to the income of Hefei, it is estimated that it will take 15 to 200,000 years, which may not meet their requirements. If there are large scientific research projects, on the one hand, researchers have something to do, on the other hand, the actual income will definitely be further improved (similar to bonuses). It's possible. There are no major projects in the institute recently. In addition, the bureaucracy of universities and research institutions in China is also a fuse, resulting in the so-called "collective resignation".

We don't know the inside story, but the collective resignation of all the people in the institute shows a problem, not a personal problem of the institute. If it is a personal problem, only a few people leave alone, it is definitely impossible to leave together, indicating that external factors have caused these people to leave. This is actually a disrespect for scientific researchers and a lack of attention to them. No wonder so many people study abroad and don't want to come back.

Seeing the collective resignation of people in Hefei Research Institute shows that their working environment and treatment are definitely unacceptable, and all staff, not individuals, leave, which shows that this situation is very serious and unacceptable to these researchers in management and other aspects. It also shows that the research environment is not ideal, so that researchers can't stay. This problem deserves serious consideration.

Of course, the reason for resigning is security. Is this reason a true view of security, or is it just a rhetoric? We didn't know it had anything to do with security. Everyone in the institute resigned together. What did the security guard do that so many people couldn't accept? Moreover, there was a conflict between the security guard and all the researchers in the institute, which could not be resolved, leading to the collective resignation of the researchers in the institute. How disappointed and hopeless it is to do such an act.

This is not the case if it is handled well, but obviously no one has come out to solve the problem, or the talents behind these security guards are the main reason why researchers leave the institute, and security guards come out as shields. Anyway, this incident shows that researchers may have been treated unfairly, and it also shows that there are problems in the scientific research environment, which is not difficult to explain why this happens.

Nowadays, many people should understand the reasons why they don't come back from studying abroad or go out when they come back. Not that it's all personal. In fact, environmental factors are also crucial. When you can't see the stage of your performance or something is dark, you will lose confidence and feel chilly. Scientific research needs a platform and environment. Now that the platform is there, the environment is still the same. No wonder some people say that technology will encounter bottlenecks. This is certainly not without reason.

Do you think there is something hidden in Hefei Research Institute's collective resignation because of its dissatisfaction with security? The researchers of Hefei Research Institute collectively resigned, and the reason for their resignation turned out to be dissatisfaction with the security of the Institute. That's a true anecdote.

As the saying goes, the pestle should be pinched like a soft one. This group of researchers in Hefei Research Institute, this pinch is really fine, precise and accurate!

How can security make these researchers dissatisfied?

Maybe the security guards forced these researchers to go to 996? Or did you deduct the salaries of these researchers? Or what did the security guard promise to these researchers but failed to deliver?

I have to sigh! It's sad to be an ordinary worker at the bottom.

Where are these researchers' dissatisfaction with security? They are clearly accusing the security guards and ignoring their work!

In Hefei Research Institute, how can researchers and security guards be at the same level? The researchers were dissatisfied with the security guards and had to go to them. The security guard was dissatisfied with the researcher, so he had to leave the security guard. What capital can the security guard have to make the researchers dissatisfied in front of the researchers in the institute? The only capital of security guards is to salute the researchers in the wrong posture or forget to salute them.

In the foreseeable future, Hefei Research Institute will definitely give great comfort to the collective resignation of researchers. Since the scientific researchers who resigned collectively expressed their dissatisfaction with the security, the institute will definitely pursue the responsibility of the security without mercy.

While I deeply sympathize with the security of Hefei Research Institute, I also deeply despise the scientific researchers who collectively resigned from Hefei Research Institute. As an intellectual and an elite human in the industry, if you are dissatisfied with Hefei Research Institute, why should you take it out on the helpless security guards?

Straight to the point, researchers generally only care about academics, environment and treatment. How can they care which security company to use? If something goes wrong, there must be a demon. There must be something hidden behind this matter. What is the general story? What's the skeleton in my closet? What does it give us? I am also very "gossiping" about this issue, because talents are too critical, too important, too precious and too rare! I try to arrange a concise and clear context with short words.

There are three protagonists in the incident: First, Hefei Institute of Material Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences proposed to replace security guards; The second is the Institute of Nuclear Energy Safety Technology under the Institute. At present, there are about seven research institutes under the Institute, and the Institute of Nuclear Energy is just one of them. Third, 90 scientific researchers resigned, mainly from the Institute of Nuclear Energy. Most of them graduated from doctoral programs and had careers.

Many netizens feel that this matter is a bit chaotic. One of the most important reasons is that the relationship between the above three is not clear.

Event fuse:

Before the conflict, the security guards of the nuclear energy institute were hired by themselves. Prior to this, on June 15, the Institute requested to change the security of the nuclear energy institute. It is said that Wu Yican, director of the Institute of Nuclear Energy, agrees.

On June 5438+05, the Institute arrived at the Nuclear Energy Institute with a large number of new security guards. Anyway, one fact is basically certain-I didn't communicate well with the staff of the nuclear energy institute in advance! On the surface, this is a logistics problem. In the final analysis, it is the management problem of scientific research institutes and nuclear energy institutes! This group of new security guards, "is efficient!" After coming, I hurried to work, removed the entrance guard, patrolled the courtyard and guarded the front and rear doors of the institute. Researchers at the Institute of Nuclear Energy had no prior knowledge and had never seen anything like this. I feel that I am not respected at all, and the timid female staff are even scared to cry!

Dozens of young employees with a little boldness collectively stood up and protested, saying that the institute changed the access control without asking their permission. They felt that they could not get the trust and respect of the institute at all, and conflicts broke out between the two sides. It's a little too much to say conflict. After all, scholars are "gentle". At that time, the two sides only had fierce words, and there was no group fight. The confrontation lasted until the afternoon 1 1, and more than 30 special police officers intervened!

Some staff members of the nuclear energy institute were very angry and offered to resign on the spot! However, the institute is a public institution. Resignation involves many departments and various procedures, not just doing it! At this time, the efficiency of the institute appeared again. It is said that many departments of the research institute were urgently informed to go to the nuclear energy institute to "assist" everyone to go through the resignation procedures, so a sensational thing happened, and about 90 staff members of the nuclear energy institute resigned collectively!

These explanations are contradictory. Since the protagonist of the story involves three parties, and the impact of the matter is so great, all three parties will have an explanation. In fact, among the three protagonists, nuclear energy chose silence. At present, it is the staff of the Institute and the Institute of Nuclear Energy who speak.

A staff member in charge of resignation management in the personnel department of the institute once told the media that more than 90 researchers resigned from the institute in June. "They all left on their own initiative, and now they have completed the resignation procedures." The staff also said that these 90 researchers were actually poached, and resignation was a normal flow of personnel.

It is understood that most of the researchers in the Institute of Nuclear Energy are master's and doctoral graduates of the Chinese University of Science and Technology, with an average age of 3 1 year. The salary given by the doctor is10.65438+1000 yuan, as well as career establishment, welfare room and scientific research project awards. Generally speaking, it is still competitive!

It is an indisputable fact that the real reason guesses that talent is the first resource. The competition among countries in the world today is actually the competition for talents. What nuclear energy loses are all scientific research talents engaged in "core", "high-end" and "basic" research, which is an invaluable treasure to climb the crown of academic and scientific research fields!

In any case, the above reasons can hardly be used as the whole explanation for the sudden collective resignation of more than 90 researchers and their "voting with their feet". Is there a deeper management problem behind it? The personnel department claims that "collective resignation" is a "normal resignation" of staff. Simply prevaricating in one sentence is really outrageous!

I am more concerned that there are six other research institutes under the Institute. What is brain drain? What are the follow-up measures of the Institute? Let the college have less disputes and more environment suitable for scientific research!

The most important thing is to create a scientific research environment in which people can give full play to their talents. Security is just an excuse. Complaining about security today, will you complain about cleaning tomorrow? These are the bottom of society. Is it appropriate to bully them?

The co-author said that the collective resignation of Hefei Institute because of dissatisfaction with the security guards was by no means such a simple matter, not to mention that the security guards took the initiative to make trouble, which affected the normal working order of the staff in the institute, but that Hefei Institute of Material Science touched the interests of some people in this reform, which led to the openness of internal contradictions.

The fundamental reason is that the new leader came to power to make drastic reforms and substitutions, but there was no coordination, which moved the interests of many groups. As a result, the former department leaders of the institute were dissatisfied, so they took advantage of the expiration of the security contract and replaced a number of new security guards, which interfered with their normal freedom of entry and exit and took the opportunity to force the palace. To say that these 90-odd people resigned, in fact, there was a manipulator behind them who didn't show up and took this opportunity to take these people away.

Of course, it will not cause brain drain in the institute, but the new official will take too much action in the process of personnel reform. If you want to resettle a group of people you bring, it will inevitably impact the interests of the original group of team employees. I don't know what the leaders of Hefei Institute of Material Science think about the problems caused by team packaging. If it is not handled properly, similar things may happen in the future.

After the security of the institute was changed, the leaders of the institute could not even enter the subordinate institutes. According to normal people's thinking, it must be that the hospital leaders are dissatisfied with their superiors and ignore them. According to an insider, it is the director of this institute who has set up a new company outside and wants to take these resigned people away, so he will treat the leaders of the institute so arrogantly. Of course, contradiction and opposition are by no means unilateral. Who gave the director of this institute the opportunity to create contradictions? Smart people will naturally know.