House vacant "stop collecting property fees"? The civil law stipulates that everyone who lives there has to pay!

In recent years, with the development of society, people's living standards are constantly improving. For the people, eating and living is a major event in life, and "housing" is the most intuitive criterion for judging the quality of living conditions.

Only when you have a house and a place to live can you settle down.

Therefore, the ups and downs of housing prices in recent years have been affecting people's hearts.

After the house is settled, a series of problems around the house will also arise.

The most prominent contradiction in recent years is the contradiction between owners and property companies. The owners of some residential areas don't want to pay property fees after they think that the service of the property company is not in place or because of various contradictions with the property company.

Especially as the owners of vacant houses, they think that the house has not been renovated or moved in, so they have not enjoyed the service of the property and do not need to pay the property fee at all.

But this is just a single idea of the owner, with no legal basis and no legal support.

First, vacant houses have to pay property fees, which is clearly stipulated in the Civil Code.

House prices have fluctuated greatly in recent years. After the outbreak began, the property market was cold, and house prices also fell to a certain extent.

With the impact of the economic downturn, many houses for sale or rent are very cold, and many factories in coastal cities have closed down or dissolved under the influence of the epidemic.

In the past two years, many migrant workers have returned to their hometowns to find another way out.

Therefore, in the past, the housing that was easy to rent and sell gradually became a hot potato, and the vacancy rate of housing was getting higher and higher. Many hoarders clamor to reduce the property fees of vacant houses.

However, according to Article 944 of the General Principles of the Civil Law, it is clear that "if the property service personnel have provided services in accordance with the agreement and relevant regulations, the owners shall not refuse to pay the property fee on the grounds that they have not accepted or do not need to accept the relevant property services.

Therefore, according to this regulation, regardless of whether the house has been renovated or not, the owners of vacant houses should pay the property fees on time.

Because property service is aimed at all operators of the whole community, it is a public service, and it is an improvement and guarantee for the living environment and living standards of the whole community.

If the owner refuses to move in due to personal subjective reasons, he should pay it on time according to the regulations, and should not use this as an excuse to refuse to pay the property fee.

Second, the services of property management companies involve all aspects of the community.

In addition to vacant houses that do not pay property fees, some owners think that the services of property management companies have not reached their expectations, or the services are not satisfactory, which is also wrong.

If the service of the property management company has caused a large number of owners' dissatisfaction and needs to be improved urgently, the owners of all communities can vote. As long as more than half of the owners agree, they can choose to change the property management company. However, if the contract is still signed, as long as the property management company operates normally and provides corresponding services, the owner needs to pay the property management fee.

Because this is a subjective problem, if the property management company has made corresponding service measures as required, but individual owners are still not satisfied, it is a conscious problem of individual owners.

Even a very high-quality property service enterprise cannot guarantee to meet the requirements of all owners and be recognized by all, so the single opinion of individual owners cannot be a legitimate reason for refusing to pay property fees.

Third, it is a very reasonable and effective means to pay property fees for vacant houses.

Once upon a time, some coastal areas introduced some policies to reduce the property fees of vacant houses, but these policies were only tried for a short period of time and then cancelled.

Because of the rising house prices in the later period, the number of multi-suite homeowners has soared. Although the proportion of property fees of multi-suite homeowners is not high, it also increases the "housing cost" of homeowners. This is a policy that is conducive to curbing real estate speculation, so it should be maintained and implemented.

In recent years, the problems of unreasonable charges and improper management of some property companies are still outstanding.

As a property service company, we should also reflect on it, increase service efforts, care for the owners, and "think about what the owners think and worry about what the owners are anxious about".

Only when the service is done well and in place can the collection of property fees be relaxed.

As a service industry, we should do a good job in training property service personnel in all aspects, and intensify inspections during the epidemic to ensure the safety of residents in the community.

As the owner, he also wants to have a safe and comfortable living environment, which needs the property management company to implement.

As long as the management of the community is good and in place, most owners are still willing to pay property fees on time. Because they enjoy the service and agree with the service of the property company, the property company should make more rectification and reflection, pay attention to it when the owners put forward their opinions, and form a good service relationship.