The owner sent a bad review banner to Xinyuan Property. Why do they do this?

In modern cities, residential quarters have become the form of people's living. The property of residential quarters manages the external environment of people's residential quarters, helps the residential quarters to clean the environment, plant green plants, maintain public facilities, etc., and makes people's living environment clean and tidy. The property company in a residential area in Ningbo, Zhejiang Province is Vanke Property, but the owners gave Vanke Property a mocking banner, which attracted many people's attention on the Internet.

It is understood that the banners made by these owners are written with ten words: What can't be done, take the first place with money? . The cause of this incident is the rental price of parking spaces in the community. The owner and Vanke Property disagreed, so the owner made such a banner and gave it to Vanke Property. On September 13, 2020, when this matter has caused a hot discussion on the Internet, Vanke Property also issued a public statement, saying that when faced with problems, the enterprise is willing to negotiate with the owners to solve them, and that it is expected to withdraw from the management of this community in the future.

This incident triggered a lot of discussion among netizens. Many netizens said that most of the property companies they met were arrogant and unreasonable, and thought that this way of sending pennants was very popular. Some netizens think that sending pennants is just a way to vent their emotions, and how to handle things correctly is more important. After careful understanding, I know this dispute in this community. In fact, from the perspective of property management companies, there is nothing in this charging standard and system that violates relevant laws and regulations. The problem is that there is no communication with individual owners in the community.

Therefore, when there is a contradiction with the property, both parties should try to put themselves in the other's shoes. Neither the property nor the owner can force each other to accept their own personal ideas. Any contradiction can be solved through equal communication. If one party does violate the rules, the other party can use legal weapons to protect itself.