What if the litigious judge is bribed by the other party?

Legal analysis: the judge in court was bribed by the other party. If you find this problem, you can handle it like this: 1. Appeal to the people's court at the next higher level that made the judgment within the statutory time limit. 2. Appeal to the people's court at the next higher level within two years after the judgment takes effect. 3. If the judgment is unfair and the judge is suspected of violating the law, he can report it to the local commission for discipline inspection or the people's procuratorate.

Legal basis: People's Republic of China (PRC) Civil Procedure Law.

Article 43 A judge shall handle a case fairly according to law. A judge may not accept guests and gifts from the parties and their agents ad litem. If a judge commits corruption, bribery, favoritism, or perverting the law, he shall be investigated for legal responsibility; If a crime is constituted, criminal responsibility shall be investigated according to law.

Article 45 If a party applies for withdrawal, it shall explain the reasons and put forward it at the hearing. If the reasons for withdrawal are known after the trial of the case begins, they may also be put forward before the end of the court debate. Before the people's court makes a decision on whether to withdraw, the person who has been applied for withdrawal shall suspend his participation in the case, unless the case requires emergency measures.

Article 200 The people's court shall retry the application of a party under any of the following circumstances: (1) There is new evidence sufficient to overturn the original judgment or ruling; (two) the basic facts identified in the original judgment or ruling lack evidence to prove; (3) The main evidence of the facts ascertained in the original judgment or ruling is forged; (four) the main evidence of the facts identified in the original judgment or ruling has not been cross-examined; (five) the main evidence needed for the trial of the case, the parties can not collect it by themselves due to objective reasons, and apply in writing to the people's court for investigation and collection, but the people's court has not investigated and collected it; (6) The application of the law in the original judgment or ruling is indeed wrong; (seven) the composition of the judicial organization is illegal or the judges who should be avoided according to law have not avoided; (8) A person without capacity for litigation has no legal representative, or a party who should participate in the litigation fails to participate in the litigation due to reasons not attributable to him or his agent ad litem. (nine) in violation of the law, depriving the parties of the right to debate; (ten) without a summons, the judgment is made by default; (eleven) the original judgment or ruling omitted or exceeded the claim; (twelve) the legal documents on which the original judgment or ruling was based have been revoked or changed; (thirteen) the judge has corruption, bribery, favoritism, perverting the law in the trial of the case.