The latest property theft case in Chongqing

The vacant houses in Chongqing for ten years were borrowed by neighbors without authorization, so neighbors and property should be held responsible. With the rising housing prices in China, some rich people choose to invest in real estate and buy many properties in several cities or local communities for appreciation or rental. However, a news circulating on the Internet caused a heated discussion among netizens. It is understood that a house in a residential area in Chongqing has been vacant for ten years. When the owner of the house returned to his house in the community, he found someone living in his house, which was full of sundries. Later, the owner found the property manager, and the property manager explained that the owner's neighbor's house leaked at a special time at the beginning of the year, so the property manager lent the key to the neighbor, and said that they didn't know that the owner of the vacant room was her. For this explanation, both the homeowner and the majority of netizens are puzzled. At present, the three parties are still negotiating on the compensation plan. Chongqing ten-year vacant house was lent to neighbors by property management without authorization. Who should be responsible? I have the following views.

1. Property. Property management is the management organization that manages the community, the organization that protects the owners' rights and interests, and the big housekeeper in the community. The house has been vacant for ten years and the property has been lent to neighbors without authorization. I think the property should bear the main responsibility.

Second, neighbors. Although neighbors are damaged by water leakage from their own houses, they should not take other people's houses for their own use without full understanding, and they have not obtained the consent of the owner, so I think neighbors should bear the responsibility for encroaching on other people's property.

Third, real estate. After the development and sale of real estate, although it is managed by the property, it should not be allowed to lend the house to others without the confirmation of the company and the original owner. Therefore, I think that real estate bears secondary responsibility and has not done a good job in supervising the property.

If you have any different views on this incident, please leave me a message in the comments section.