The ashtray fell from the sky, causing injuries. Detailed request for defense and defense! ! Urgent! Urgent! !

The case given by 1 Lou is just a court practice, which does not mean that it is right. Moreover, China is not a case law country, and the previous cases cannot guide the subsequent judgments. I think it is obviously unfair to let so many tenants bear the responsibility. Only one person can throw it. Why should people who don't throw away and don't know bear it? What is fairness? The court's decision has no legal basis, which is tantamount to bending the law, what's more, there are no fingerprints on the ashtray? Can't you cross-examine a family and use polygraph equipment to provide directions for solving crimes? It is because it is not a criminal case that the public security is unwilling to accept and investigate it. Because of these public servants, many users have to bear the unjust debt of compensation for no reason. Article 130 of the General Principles of Civil Law stipulates that if two or more persons infringe upon the rights, they shall be jointly and severally liable. If this law becomes the basis of judgment, it can only be said that such judges will be laid off. Are these users infringing? What do you mean * * * is infringing? We did it together, on purpose. For example, several people beat one person, and the last one killed another. Because other people also participated in the fight together, it is called * * * infringement. Otherwise, a person threw a stone in the street and killed someone. I don't know who it is. Don't arrest a street person, let them compensate together. The judge is retarded!