A man in Zhejiang privately occupied the parking space, wrote down the gauntlet, and indicated that whoever moved the car first was the grandson. What should the property do in the end?

A man in Zhejiang had an altercation with the other party because the parking space was occupied. In order to block the other car, he also wrote a "gauntlet", indicating that whoever moved the car first was the grandson. This incident has aroused the hot discussion and concern of netizens on the Internet. In the end, neither of them took the train, and they also made a plan to shield each other 100 days.

Things can be solved, thanks to the property; The property found a forklift, removed the vehicle occupying the parking space and parked it in an empty parking space on the other floor of the garage, and the matter came to an end. This is a very small matter, just because the two sides do not give in to each other, but finally attracted the attention of the whole network. As the owner of the parking space said in the afternoon, "whoever moves the car first is the grandson." In order to fight for breath, the two reached an impasse. Different netizens also expressed different views on this matter.

Event review: the parking space was occupied and the owner of the parking space was trapped in a traffic jam in a residential area in Zhejiang. A Buick GL8 is parked in the private parking space of Land Rover. The event happened on the first day of the Mid-Autumn Festival holiday. When the Land Rover owner returned to the parking space, he found that the parking space was occupied by Buick vehicles. There is no contact information in the car. The Land Rover owner first called "1 14" to inquire about the owner's contact information, but failed to contact the owner, and then found the owner's phone number at the gate of the community and called the other party to move the car.

The Buick owner said that the Land Rover owner should wait for ten minutes before moving the car by himself. Originally, the matter was solved, but in the process of Buick owners coming slowly, it once again triggered the dissatisfaction of Land Rover owners. Land Rover owners whose parking spaces are occupied are naturally somewhat dissatisfied, so they complain that the other party is moving slowly; I'm not sorry for blaming each other like this, but I didn't know this was your parking space and I didn't see the sign.

In the face of a series of rhetorical questions from Land Rover owners, Buick owners were silent. When the Land Rover owner asked, "If you don't move, I won't move. It's okay, let's not move." The Buick driver who heard this turned his head and left the Land Rover driver in place.

In this way, the two sides started a "traffic jam war." In order to completely block each other, Land Rover owners specially rented the parking space behind them for half a year. The Land Rover is parked in the aisle. In order to apologize and let the neighbors know the reason, a paper was posted on the car to explain what happened, and the sentence "You and I finally agreed that whoever moves first will be the grandson" was attached. Because of one sentence, two people have been angry, and no one wants to move the car.

Event handling: the two sides don't bow their heads to each other, and the property comes forward to coordinate and solve the old saying: "People live a face, trees live a skin", and malicious words have been released, and no one wants to be a grandson. At this point, it is impossible to expect the two car owners to move their own vehicles. Although Land Rover owners are in charge, they can park their vehicles in the passage, which leads to frequent traffic jams in the garage.

Faced with such a situation, the remaining car owners can watch the excitement with a playful attitude from the beginning and understand the practices of Land Rover owners. After a long time, the visit was affected and I no longer paid attention to the follow-up of the incident. I just hope to solve the problem quickly and make the garage road smooth.

Property companies often receive complaints from car owners and are under great pressure. The best way to solve this situation is to negotiate with two drivers in a friendly way, hoping that one of them can move the car and solve the problem. In the face of that cruel remark, neither side is willing to bow their heads.

In order to solve the problem as soon as possible, the property management company will no longer accept complaints from other owners. Vehicles can only be removed by the property management company, and the property staff negotiated and communicated with the Buick owners who occupied the parking space. Finally the owner agreed to move the car. In this case, the property found a forklift and moved Buick vehicles to other empty parking spaces, so that the "traffic jam war" came to an end.

The contradiction that could have been easily solved has triggered a "traffic jam war" that the whole network pays attention to because of the attitude problem. The same thing happened to me, but the ending was completely different. The parents of a child who received a training class occupied a friend's parking space; After a friend called to inform him to move the car, the other party apologized on the phone and said that he would go to the garage to move the car immediately.

Different from Buick owners, the owner my friend met brought him a bottle of drink to express his inner apologies in this way. After chatting, the two left contact information with each other and had business dealings. It is wrong to occupy the parking space. Facing the urging of the owner of the parking space, we need to apologize and move the vehicle quickly. In this way, we can calm each other's dissatisfaction.

Who do you think is right or wrong about this?