Job Recruitment Website - Property management - The nature of housing reform is facing embarrassment. Who should pay the housing reform property fee?
The nature of housing reform is facing embarrassment. Who should pay the housing reform property fee?
existing problems
At present, there are many problems in the property management of housing reform houses, which are highlighted in the following aspects:
First, who should pay the property fee for housing reform? This is the core issue in the property management of housing reform. Is it an individual or a unit? All along, the property service fee of housing reform is paid by the housing reform unit. In fact, from the perspective of housing reform, the cost of property services should be borne by individuals after housing reform. However, many housing reform tenants have no awareness of paying property service fees, and property management fees cannot be collected. Housing reform individuals generally pay 2-3 yuan cleaning fee and 3-5 yuan security fee to the neighborhood committee every month. Even with such a small amount of money, the collection rate of 100% cannot be achieved.
Second, the benchmark price of property services set by the government is low, and property management companies cannot make ends meet. There is no investment in the community, forming a vicious circle.
、
Third, the maintenance funds are seriously insufficient. After the housing reform, according to the requirements of the unified management mode of commercial housing, the maintenance fund must be withdrawn, and the withdrawal ratio is 2% of the house price. In fact, the quality of many housing reform houses is generally poor; Long-term low rent leads to the inability to maintain houses in time, resulting in low intact rate of houses, outdated equipment, lack of maintenance funds and great maintenance pressure.
How to solve
To solve the property fee problem of housing reform, we must start from the following aspects.
First, the current confusion of housing reform fees is due to the lack of necessary laws and regulations as guidance. Therefore, people in the industry generally believe that laws and regulations are urgently needed to "sort out" and relevant government departments should issue special regulations to solve it.
Second, the government gives subsidies and support to the property management companies that have undergone housing reform. Liu Gang, director of the Property Management Department of Beijing Housing Authority, believes that the after-sales management and charging of housing reform is a "long-standing problem" and the state should have a clear regulation on it. Before the introduction of the regulations, we can now consider applying for state financial subsidies for property companies.
At present, the property management of most housing reform houses is still in the state of "welfare" or "semi-welfare", and the owners' concept has not changed, and they are unwilling to pay or pay less. The government should give some preferential policies to the property management companies in the housing reform, and at the same time allocate special funds to subsidize the property management companies, so as to ensure that the property management companies will not withdraw from the property management market in the housing reform one after another under normal operating conditions, thus supporting the property management companies to take over the housing reform and form a virtuous circle mechanism.
Third, establish a perfect maintenance fund management system.
There is a national document that clearly stipulates: "When the old public houses are sold, the purchaser shall pay the maintenance fund to the selling unit according to the proportion of 2% of the purchase price" and "the maintenance fund shall be deposited in a special bank account for special purposes, and it is strictly forbidden to use it for other purposes". The maintenance fund involves the interests of the owners. The management, use and raising of funds should have strict rules and special management institutions. The insiders believe that the establishment of a sound fund management system is of great help to the property management of housing reform houses.
brick by brick
The industry believes that it takes a process from enterprise payment to individual payment. But in the end, we must liberate enterprises. If all households in the housing reform are allowed to bear the property fees at one time, I am afraid it is not realistic, because many users of the housing reform are mostly working families with limited income. If it is not handed in by then, it will put the property management in trouble.
It is now in progress. According to the relevant regulations on the listing and trading of housing reform houses in this city, after the public houses purchased by households are listed and traded, the property rights of the houses will be transformed into the property rights of commercial houses, and the newly purchased and acquired households should bear all the property management fees. It is the trend of housing reform property service fees in the industry that individual payment replaces enterprise payment, but all parties in Qi Xin still need to make concerted efforts in the process of transformation.
(The above answers were published on 20 13-08-26. Please refer to the actual situation for the current purchase policy. )
When buying a new house, go to Sohu Focus.
- Previous article:How about Hefei Sitengda Trading Co., Ltd.?
- Next article:Where is the Great Wutong Mountain in Shenzhen?
- Related articles
- Where is Loudi Ink Lanting?
- May day labor day plan
- Is Nanchang Gandhi Jiayuan a rough house or a fine decoration?
- Property right analysis of Kangqiao South Park
- What does uptown mean?
- What about the property of Lyon Garden (Villa) in the Pearl City of Xinhu?
- What is the telephone number of Beijing Shun Xin Yi Tianhe Xi Run Marketing Center?
- How to turn on natural gas?
- Where is Binzhou Xiangchi Xiyuan?
- Where is Park Hyatt Mansion in Jinzhong, Dongguan?