The house has a useful life, why is the second-hand house still desperately living up?

First, it will be tried in Shanghai and Chongqing, but after the introduction of property tax, it will quickly push the house price to continue to rise, and the purpose of national tax can be successfully realized.

We should learn from the Chongqing government, because Chongqing has increased the supply of affordable housing (public rental housing), and the housing price in Chongqing is still the lowest in the country, and it is calculated by suite. Inflation will rise in the future, but at least it will curb the excessive rise in house prices. We can't learn from the Chongqing government, because Chongqing only levies property tax on high-end houses, which has nothing to do with curbing housing prices in Chongqing. Obviously, it is a policy to kill pigs and kill the rich and drive the rich out of Chongqing, but the people of Chongqing are never tired of it. This city is not suitable for rich people to invest, and the government has a serious mentality of killing the rich, but it is suitable for small business. When small enterprises become bigger, they must turn to other cities for development.

At present, the state has also introduced policies to openly participate in real estate speculation, and the property tax is passed on to the rent. It seems that the state wants to crack down on people who have no room to live in and pay more rent, with the aim of forcing ordinary people to pay for a house.

Finally, it was passed on to renters, and the rent rose, which intensified the emergence of a new round of investment in grabbing houses. House prices continued to rise, taxes increased, and national goals were realized. The transfer of property tax by the government can temporarily affect the contradiction between supply and demand and security. Levying property tax will make the country strong and prosperous, but for the sake of national interests, ordinary people have to sacrifice their personal interests.

There was a real estate tax reform, and the government was most afraid that people with houses would be serious. They all went to the country to ask for money for land appreciation, or people all went to the country to ask for their own land ownership, so the country would be in big trouble, hehe.

Key point: it is very simple to solve the relationship between supply and demand. I don't know why the country deliberately makes it particularly complicated! ! !

It is hard to say that the property tax policy will affect housing prices in the short term. Because the country has not substantially solved the contradiction between supply and demand of affordable housing, every time the country introduces a policy, it will increase the cost in disguise. The higher the price, the more it will be, and finally the people will pay the bill. So it is bullish in the long run.

The new national policy is to "curb the excessive rise in housing prices". The state requires that house prices continue to rise, but not too fast. The decline in house prices does not conform to the new national policy. The New Deal originally didn't need a drop in house prices, but it needed a harmonious and moderate rise.

Example: Someone went to the market and bought a piglet for 100 RMB, and was adopted for 10 years. After 1 year, it grew into a big pig that can be sold for 100 RMB. A community organization tells you that you can't take 1 RMB from the value-added part of pigs, but you should collect 100 RMB from the value-added tax on pigs every year. This is the tax. In what form do you think it should be collected? Ha ha. The policy of mass organizations to suppress pigs is to clearly tell them to grab them, and not to buy pigs if they have the ability to see if the price of pigs will fall. But pigs are related to people's livelihood, and many people need to buy them to eat or raise them. If the organization solves the supply and demand of a large number of piglets and big pigs from the source, the problem will come! ! The question is whether community organizations are willing to do so. Instead of simply studying how to grab it next. Otherwise, once robbed, the cost of pig price will double.

The price increase is not the rise in house prices, but the depreciation of housing every year. The reason for the appreciation is the continuous appreciation of government land.

In foreign countries, land appreciation is subject to property tax (property tax and property tax, whatever the name is). Foreign land is owned by privatized owners, and their own land has increased in value. Foreign owners are very happy and of course willing to pay property tax. China is also going to tax, but the problem is that houses are depreciating every year. All the land in China is owned by the state, and ordinary people only have the right to use it. However, the land continues to increase in value, and the value-added part is also the value-added part of the country's land. The question is who should be taxed for the value-added part of the property tax? Does the local government require the central government to collect it? No Go to the people to collect it, but the people's houses are depreciating, but they have to be passed on to raise house prices, leading to an explosion in house prices.