Is it appropriate for the owner of a residential area in Wuhan Optics Valley to buy more than 500 parking spaces?

The owner of a residential area in Wuhan, Hubei Province bought 556 parking spaces and only sold them without renting them?

The owner of a residential area in Wuhan Optics Valley bought 556 parking spaces, forcing everyone to buy parking spaces.

In recent years, there have been many problems and things about parking spaces in newspapers, media and the Internet. Parking in old communities is difficult, underground parking spaces and parking lots are insufficient, and road planning and parking space planning in some places are insufficient. Car owners' parking has become hiding, playing hide-and-seek, fighting guerrilla warfare and even causing some disputes.

In real life, the game of grabbing parking spaces is often staged. In some properties, it seems that the owners want to buy parking spaces in underground parking lots or rent parking spaces, which will generate a sum of income. Parking spaces on roads and sidewalks are poorly planned, and parking is not allowed in some green spaces and open spaces. So, is it out of consideration of economic interests? But does the owner rent or buy a parking space?

In Optics Valley, Wuhan, Hubei Province, in a residential area, an owner bought 556 parking spaces, but only sold them without renting them, which also caused a quarrel among other owners. (According to Shi Jing and Beiqing Daily client 65438+reported on February 30th)

In this case, everyone used to rent a parking space, no problem, but suddenly the property sold the parking space to the same person. He owns it, he sells it, and he only sells it, not rents it. This also leads to the shortage of parking spaces, which makes it difficult for people to park.

In this case, an owner can buy all the parking spaces, and he can only sell them but not rent them. Theoretically, it is possible, and legally, it is impeccable. But what is his purpose? Let's make a profit. This is a naked two-way dealer, changing hands. It may also be that the property is not good, forcing the owner to buy a parking space, so he changed hands to the owner to act as an agent, operate and trade. He is a man. He owns it. He will take care of it.

If you ask me, you can't get up early without profit. You must still buy a parking space in this neighborhood. If you buy it and then sell it, there must be a price difference, and there are some fees, taxes and other expenses. Therefore, changing hands to change hands, the owner did not take advantage of anything, but caused inconvenience.

Parking spaces, most owners may not want to buy, the price is not cheap, make do with rent, property companies also have investment in construction and operation, but also need management and maintenance, and the rent may be barely maintained. Who knows how long it will take? I might as well go out once and recover my investment and make a fortune. Garage is also a way to do business and get rich, but it increases the burden on owners, many of whom are working-class. Even for petty bourgeoisie and middle class, it is not a small burden to take out a sum of money to buy a parking space at once.

Such a thing is not prohibited by law, but can the relevant departments manage it? As long as people complain, it is acceptable to cause inconvenience and parking difficulties to the people. Relevant departments also indicated that they would coordinate the solution, and people who bought parking spaces also took out some parking spaces for rent.

In this case, we can also see that capital and private sometimes monopolize, and property and developers are still enterprises, but also subject to the constraints of the owners' management Committee and moral responsibility. If it is transferred to an individual, nothing can be said except money. I bought my personal belongings. I can do whatever I want. You can buy it if you want, but I'm sure the price will be higher This is not to let others suffer and make money by themselves. Property, developers may make cages with this person, and pit dad and consumers together, but you may find the pit angry and funny.

The author thinks that such a thing also involves monopoly, at least it is not moral, and it feels a bit like fooling and playing with the public. Whether private or public, enterprises or individuals, make money, or don't infringe on the interests of most people and offend the public. In the past, everyone rented a car and lived in peace, but this balance was broken, which made it difficult for some people to park, and even caused road congestion and traffic congestion. This is man-made congestion and trouble.

This also shows that capital is profit-seeking, so consider making money. Blocked or not, you can buy it from me at any time. Sorry, I only sell it, not rent it. Such a thing shows that for capital, private enterprises, individuals and individuals, we also need third-party supervision and national legal supervision, soft deterrence, soft warning and soft supervision from moral and public opinion forces, as well as news media, public opinion, moral education and civilization construction. You can't be heartless just to be rich, or take advantage of loopholes to find ways to make money. Such a thing can be regarded as man-made destruction of harmonious order, creating problems and troubles, and coercing consumers to buy and make profits. Although it may not be illegal, it is immoral, unkind and uncomfortable. Objectively speaking, you have caused inconvenience to everyone and made it difficult to park in the community. Keep this way of making money.